Back

Experimental Disturbance-Induced Shifts in Benthic Functional Diversity: the importance of marine protected areas in soft-bottom ecosystems

Meijer, K. J.; Franken, O.; Govers, L. L.; van der Heide, T.; Willebrands, E.; de Wilt, M. E.; de Wit, B.; Olff, H.

2026-06-04 ecology
10.64898/2026.06.01.729212 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Benthic communities form the foundation of food webs in coastal and shelf seas worldwide. However, these communities face severe threats from anthropogenic bottom-disturbing activities. Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) effectively safeguard benthic communities against such disturbances. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of MPAs for the recovery of benthic communities in highly dynamic soft-bottom areas is much debated, as these communities are thought to be adapted to natural dynamics and therefore resistant to human impacts. In this study, we examine whether MPAs in highly dynamic seas support sensitive communities that are affected by bottom-disturbing fishing gear. Utilising a Before-After-Control-Impact (BACI) experimental design, we investigated the effects of disturbance caused by a shrimp trawl gear on macrozoobenthic communities within MPAs in a dynamic coastal soft-bottom sea over two years. We assessed changes in taxonomic and functional diversity, as well as community composition, across three levels of trawling intensity and frequency (low intensity and high frequency, high intensity and low frequency, and high intensity and high frequency) compared with undisturbed control areas. The study was carried out in the lower dynamic areas of the study system, where we found that, even light trawling gear impacted functional diversity and community assembly of macrozoobenthic communities, leading to shifts in functional groups. Contrastingly, taxonomic diversity metrics were not affected. We found that taxonomic and functional turnover increased stronger over time than the undisturbed control, with the highest turnover in the most frequently disturbed treatments. Long-living species were negatively impacted by disturbance, and the abundance of scavengers and predators increased in trawled areas, with possible radiating effects into undisturbed areas, while suspension feeders declined. Our findings demonstrate that anthropogenic disturbance remains a relevant ecological pressure, even in areas that may appear resilient due to their dynamic nature. MPAs can then provide ecological benefits by protecting sensitive and functionally important species. Article Impact StatementMarine Protected Areas are effective in safeguarding sensitive communities from anthropogenic disturbance.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 4%
31.4%
2
Marine Ecology Progress Series
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.7%
3
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 16%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Marine Science
62 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
6
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
7
ICES Journal of Marine Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
8
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
9
Biological Conservation
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
10
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Coral Reefs
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
FACETS
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
15
Journal of Fish Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
16
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
17
Limnology and Oceanography
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
18
Conservation Letters
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
19
Hydrobiologia
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
20
Journal of Biogeography
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
21
Biological Invasions
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%