Transcriptomic profiling of the human habenula reveals a shared molecular architecture across mood disorders
Cameron, S.; Maddock, M. L.; Walpole, S.; Weston-Green, K.; Newell, K. A.
Show abstract
The habenula is a critical regulator of monoaminergic and reward circuitry and is increasingly implicated in the neurobiology of mood disorders. Preclinical studies demonstrate that habenula hyperactivity drives depressive-like behaviours and can be reversed by interventions such as ketamine and deep brain stimulation. However, the molecular architecture of the human habenula remains largely unexplored. Here, we applied a transdiagnostic framework to characterise shared and disorder-specific transcriptomic alterations across affective illness. Bulk RNA sequencing was performed on postmortem habenula-enriched tissue from controls (n = 6), major depressive disorder (MDD; n = 6), and bipolar disorder (BPD; n = 6) cases from the Netherlands Brain Bank. Differential gene expression and differential transcript usage (DTU) analyses identified diagnosis- and sex-associated transcriptional changes. Individual diagnostic comparisons revealed modest numbers of differentially expressed genes (MDD: 60; BPD: 66; FDR < 0.05), consistent with limited power and/or subtle disorder-specific effects. In contrast, transdiagnostic analysis combining affective cases (MDD + BPD; n = 12) identified 378 differentially expressed genes, indicating a robust shared molecular signature across mood disorders. Upregulated genes were enriched for potassium channel activity, calcium homeostasis, and Wnt signalling, consistent with altered neuronal excitability, while downregulated genes were enriched for metal ion binding. DTU analysis identified 49 isoform switches, highlighting isoform-specific regulation not captured at the gene level. Biological sex contributed substantially to transcriptomic variation, with 67 differentially expressed genes and 18 isoform switches differing between males and females, including sex-dependent regulation of GPR151, NLGN3, and KIF17, genes known to influence neuronal excitability. Together, these findings support a shared molecular architecture across mood disorders and underscore the importance of transdiagnostic and sex-informed approaches.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The genomic basis of mood instability: identification of 46 loci in 363,705 UK Biobank participants, genetic correlation with psychiatric disorders, and association with gene expression and function. 95%
- Polygenic prediction of major depressive disorder and related traits in African ancestries UK Biobank participants 94%
- Transcriptomic pathology of neocortical microcircuit cell types across psychiatric disorders 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neurovegetative symptom subtypes in young people with major depressive disorder and their structural brain correlates 96%
- Acylcarnitines metabolism in depression: association with diagnostic status, depression severity and symptom profile in the NESDA cohort 95%
- Extracellular Matrix Abnormalities in the Hippocampus of Subjects with Substance Use Disorder 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Novel polygenic risk score links depression-related cortical transcriptomic changes to brain morphology and depressive symptoms in men 96%
- Neurocognitive and Functional Heterogeneity in Depressed Youth 95%
- Sensitive period-regulating genetic pathways and exposure to adversity shape risk for depression 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Subcortical brain alterations in carriers of genomic copy number variants 92%
- Two schizophrenia imaging signatures and their associations with cognition, psychopathology, and genetics in the general population 92%
- Decoding shared versus divergent transcriptomic signatures across cortico-amygdala circuitry in PTSD and depressive disorders 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.