Back

The degree of subgenome expression bias in B. napus changes between cultivars, tissues and across time

Woolfenden, H. C.; Wells, R.; Morris, R. J.

2026-06-04 plant biology
10.64898/2026.06.01.728460 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Most extant plants show evidence of past polyploidization events in their genomes. Allopolyploids arise from hybridisation, resulting in the polyploid genome comprising subgenomes from different ancestors. Subsequent adaptation to their environment or selection pressure for specific traits has led to several allopolyploids exhibiting an unequal contribution from their subgenomes to their phenotype. Given the diversity of cultivars grown for different environments, it is possible that the associated regulatory changes may have given rise to different subgenome expression biases. Likewise, different tissues and developmental stages have distinct expression profiles that may correspond more strongly to one subgenome over the other(s). Here, we investigate different metrics for quantifying the contribution of each subgenome in space (tissue) and time (development) in cultivars of Brassica napus. Brassica napus has two subgenomes, A and C, from its ancestors Brassica rapa (A) and Brassica oleracea (C). We find that the C genome has higher overall expression than the A genome, whereas the average expression per gene is higher for the A genome. Direct comparison of homoeologous pairs reveals higher expression of genes on the C genome. We find that the degree of expression bias can change between cultivars, tissues and across time with bias quantification being strongly dependent on the metric. These findings help explain contradictory reports on expression bias and genome dominance. Significance statementWe demonstrate how different metrics of expression bias between subgenomes in polyploids can lead to conflicting inferences. We show that expression can be viewed as either A or C-biased, yet the differences are small, calling into question the relevance of subgenome dominance and expression bias in B. napus.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Plant Biology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.4%
2
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 1%
7.0%
3
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
7.0%
4
Annals of Botany
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.0%
5
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.6%
6
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
7
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
8
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
9
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
10
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
11
Applications in Plant Sciences
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
12
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.3%
13
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.3%
14
American Journal of Botany
47 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.3%
15
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.3%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 25%
2.0%
17
The Plant Genome
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
18
The Plant Cell
161 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
19
Plant Direct
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
20
Planta
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
21
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
22
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
23
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
24
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
25
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
26
AoB PLANTS
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
27
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
28
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
29
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
30
Quantitative Plant Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%