Back

Determinants and propagation of velocity uncertainty in 2D phase-contrast MRI

Rodriguez-Soto, A. E.; Schuchardt, E. L.; Narayan, H. K.; Printz, B. F.; Hegde, S.; Hopkins, S. R.; Contijoch, F.

2026-06-04 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.06.01.26353730 medRxiv
Show abstract

Purpose: To quantify the contributions of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and velocity-to-encoding ratio (v/VENC) to velocity uncertainty in phase-contrast (PC) MRI and to develop a framework for in vivo voxel-wise uncertainty estimation. Methods: Through-plane 2D PC-MRI of the ascending aorta was acquired using multiple velocity encodings (150, 200, 300 cm/s) and flip angles (0, 5, 15, 20 degrees) to vary v/VENC and SNR. Voxel-wise SNR and velocity uncertainty maps were generated using empirically calibrated phase-noise modeling. Phase-resolved subject-level analyses were performed to quantify the relative contributions of SNR and |v|/VENC to percent velocity uncertainty (%unc). Uncertainty was propagated to flow, stroke volume (SV), and cardiac output (CO). Results: Velocity uncertainty varied substantially across the cardiac cycle and depended on both SNR and |v|/VENC. Across cardiac phases, |v|/VENC accounted for most explained variance in %unc (partial R2=0.666), while SNR provided a smaller but meaningful contribution (partial R2=0.287; full R2=0.909). Near peak systole, SNR contributed more strongly while overall uncertainty remained low. In contrast, diastolic %unc became unstable as velocity approached zero. These effects were most pronounced at low |v|/VENC, where higher VENC settings increased uncertainty despite similar SNR. SV uncertainty ranged from 0.27% to 1.07% across VENCxFA protocols. Conclusion: Velocity uncertainty in PC-MRI depends on both SNR and VENC adequacy in a physiologically phase-dependent manner. Relative uncertainty may become inadequate for precise quantification in low-flow applications, such as diastolic regurgitant jets, despite adequate SNR. Spatiotemporal uncertainty mapping provides a framework for uncertainty-aware PC-MRI acquisition and interpretation.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.