Back

Integrated physiological markers of drought tolerance and yield stability in cotton under deficit irrigation

Tortorici, N.; Dong, X.; Duarte, T. F.; Iacuzzi, N.; Ahmad, U.; Tuttolomondo, T.

2026-06-01 plant biology
10.64898/2026.05.31.729145 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The selection of drought-resistant cotton genotypes with high productivity and improved water-use efficiency is an increasingly pressing challenge in arid and semi-arid cotton-growing regions, where climate variability is intensifying water scarcity. This study evaluated two widely cultivated cotton varieties in Texas, NG 4190 B3XF and ST 4990 B3XF, under full and moderate deficit irrigation to identify physiological markers associated with contrasting yield responses under water limitation. A comprehensive set of physiological traits was assessed, including plant water status, leaf gas exchange, carbon isotope composition ({delta}13C), total nitrogen and C/N ratio, chlorophyll fluorescence, light and CO{square} response curves, and canopy temperature. While no yield differences were observed under full irrigation, moderate water deficit resulted in stable seed and fiber yield in NG 4190, but significant yield reduction in ST 4990. Yield differences were not explained by instantaneous gas exchange or direct biochemical limitations of photosynthesis, but rather by integrated physiological behavior over time. Key discriminating traits included midday relative water content (RWC), photosynthetic light-response parameters ( and Pm), stomatal optimization parameter (g{square}), and {delta}13C. NG 4190 exhibited higher RWC, more negative {delta}13C, and higher g{square} values, indicating a less conservative stomatal regulation strategy that supported sustained carbon assimilation under water stress. These findings provide insight into the physiological mechanisms underlying cotton performance under drought and support the use of integrated physiological markers for the selection of resilient genotypes in water-limited environments.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 8%
22.2%
2
Plant Direct
95 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.0%
3
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.0%
4
BMC Plant Biology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.3%
7
Plant Science
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
8
Plants
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.5%
9
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
10
The Plant Genome
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
11
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Plant Stress
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
14
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
15
Environmental and Experimental Botany
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
16
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
17
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
18
Plant Methods
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
19
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
20
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
21
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
22
Planta
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
23
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
24
Physiologia Plantarum
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
25
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
26
Annals of Botany
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
27
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.9%
28
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
29
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
30
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%