Back

GalaxyVS: Exploring 100-Billion Compounds in Seconds

Hong, X.; Li, P.; Zhu, W.; Wu, C.; Guo, H.; Tan, H.; Wu, Q.; Wu, K.; Chen, L.; Jia, Y.; Gao, B.; Jian, X.; Lai, Z.; Lu, Y.; Meng, X.; Lan, Y.

2026-06-03 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.05.29.728912 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We present GalaxyVS, a hardware-software co-designed virtual screening framework built to explore the 100-billion commercially accessible chemical space in seconds, deployed at the National Supercomputing Center in Tianjin. Built upon the dense vector retrieval paradigm of DrugCLIP, GalaxyVS bypasses the structural dependencies and computational overhead of classical docking to enable rapid screening against experimentally determined as well as geometrically feasible pockets on AlphaFold-predicted structures. To scale this paradigm to the 100-billion level, the system must overcome the significant computational burden of offline representation encoding, critical memory and I/O bottlenecks during online retrieval, and the risks of diversity collapse and precision loss within final screening results. Utilizing the heterogeneous supercomputing infrastructure, GalaxyVS accelerates the offline encoding through deep operator adaptations and resolves online retrieval bottlenecks via disk-native vector indexing coupled with in-memory staging to ensure both broad accessibility and high throughput. Concurrently, a two-stage refinement protocol effectively mitigates diversity collapse and ensures high-fidelity affinity ranking. Consequently, GalaxyVS achieves a daily scoring throughput of 1.5 x 1016 target-ligand pairs, representing a six-orders-of-magnitude leap over previous supercomputing records. Driven by this throughput, we screened nearly 100,000 protein structures across six species against the 100-billion compound library in just 16 hours. The resulting comprehensive cross-species interaction landscape, GalaxyDB, will be openly released at https://galaxyvs.drugclip.com.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.