Back

DINMC: A Deep Learning Framework for Interpretable Normative Model Construction and Pathological Brain Alteration Detection

Ge, Z.; Liu, S.; Dou, W.

2026-05-29 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.05.29.728652 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Background and ObjectiveNormative modeling is a key tool for understanding brain alterations in neurodegenerative diseases, such as cerebellar-type multiple system atrophy. However, existing methods lack interpretability and fail to capture clinically meaningful pathological changes. This study presents DINMC, a Deep Interpretable Normative Model Construction framework, which combines autoencoder-based learning with statistical hypothesis testing to better capture and interpret disease-specific neu-roanatomical changes. MethodsThe DINMC framework constructs normative models using neuroimaging data from multi-site large healthy cohorts. It utilizes a U-shaped convolutional autoencoder to train these models, which are then applied to reconstruct brain features from both patients and healthy controls within the same study cohort. Pathological confidence values are derived by fusing original and deviation feature spaces, offering a measure of disease-related pathology reflected in each dimension of the features. The framework was validated through statistical analysis and prognostic classification and regression tasks. ResultsThe pathological confidence provides valuable insights into the neuroanatomical regions most affected by the disease, as well as the correlation between changes in these regions and clinical assessment scales. Our optimal model outperform traditional methods in prognostic prediction tasks, with an AUC of 0.972 for classification tasks and an R2 of 0.432 for regression tasks. ConclusionDINMC provides a novel and interpretable framework for neuroimaging analysis. By combining deep learning and statistical hypothesis testing, this framework offers a unique solution to improving both the interpretability and performance of normative models in neuroimaging. The approach is scalable to other neuroimaging datasets, offering a versatile tool for broader biomedical applications.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
2
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.4%
3
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.3%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.3%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.0%
7
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
8
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
9
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
11
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
12
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
14
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
15
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
16
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
17
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
18
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
19
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
20
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
21
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
22
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
23
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
24
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
25
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.9%
26
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
27
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
28
Neurocomputing
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
29
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
Frontiers in Neuroimaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%