Back

Implementation and impact of a 5-year community-based tuberculosis screening intervention in Cambodia: a mixed-methods pragmatic evaluation using the RE-AIM framework

Soun, B.; Chamroen, P.; Nagashima-Hayashi, M.; Thovy, H.; Menh, S.; Ong, S.; Tep, S.; Eng, S.; Aung, K. M.; Yi, S.; Choub, S. C.; Tuot, S.; Teo, A. K. J.

2026-06-01 public and global health
10.64898/2026.05.29.26354425 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Cambodia is a high-TB burden country where over a third of TB cases have gone undetected. The Community Mobilisation Initiatives to End TB (COMMIT) programme, implemented across four provinces and 27 operational districts (ODs) in Cambodia from October 2019 to September 2024, aimed to improve TB case finding, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention through community-driven approaches. This study evaluated the implementation, programme outcomes, and sustainability of COMMIT to inform future TB initiatives. Methods: This mixed-methods explanatory sequential study used the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Quantitative data were collected from the programme database and the national TB Management Information System (TB-MIS). In-depth interviews, guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), explored contextual factors influencing programme implementation and complement quantitative findings. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively to estimate screening coverage, diagnostic yield, and construct care cascades. Qualitative data were transcribed and translated into English, coded, consolidated into a matrix structured using RE-AIM and TDF components, and analysed thematically. Results: COMMIT screened 695,970 people for TB. Key populations were reached, though sex and age disparities in screening participation reflected underlying social and structural barriers. Approximately 98% of those screened underwent diagnostic testing. Treatment initiation (>99%) and completion (>97%) rates were high. COMMIT operationalised contact investigation and evaluation for TB preventive treatment (TPT), screening over 90% of notified contacts. More than 20,000 people were TPT-eligible, of whom 68.7% enrolled in and 86.2% completed TPT. These programme outcomes were supported by strong community engagement, expansion of rapid molecular diagnostics, and programme adaptability during COVID-19. COMMIT was scaled from 10 to 27 ODs, during which it strengthened community capacity by training healthcare workers and expanding peer support groups. Stakeholders emphasised the need to reinforce local ownership and public-private sector collaboration, strengthen integrated services, and de-implement low-value practices such as symptom-based screening. Conclusions: COMMIT improved TB case detection, treatment support, and prevention in Cambodia through community-led strategies and sustained capacity building. Maintaining the programme impact will require continued investment in community systems, de-implementation of low-value practices, and the adoption of efficient, person-centred approaches that address evolving community needs.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
21.8%
2
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.8%
3
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.1%
5
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
6
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.5%
7
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.0%
8
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
9
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
10
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
11
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
12
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
13
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
14
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
16
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
17
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
18
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
19
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Malaria Journal
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%