Back

Online psychoeducation and assessment for borderline personality disorder as a first step of care: A pilot study assessing safety, feasibility, and mechanisms of change

Choi-Kain, L.; Crisp, D.; Mermin, S.; Murray, G. E.; Jurist, J. B.; Masland, S. R.; Mosby, M.; Germine, L.; Ren, B.

2026-06-01 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.05.29.26354218 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Treatment guidelines for borderline personality disorder (BPD) recommend assessment, diagnosis, and psychoeducation. We report on the feasibility and safety of a randomized controlled trial protocol of online psychoeducation, assessment, and personalized feedback as an immediate first step of care for BPD. Methods Newly diagnosed participants were randomized to receive 10 videos about BPD or general mental health for two weeks. Half the participants receiving BPD videos were randomized to receive personalized feedback on changes in symptom ratings and cognitive performance. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) evaluated interpersonal interactions, emotions, and behaviors for 30 days. BPD symptoms, depression, and personality functioning were assessed at baseline, after videos, after feedback, and one month later. Results Eighty-two participants were randomized into three conditions that did not differ significantly in terms of demographics or baseline variables. Dropout occurred for 32.9% of the sample. No differences in rate of emergency room visits, hospitalizations, or other escalations in level of care were reported among groups. Satisfaction was higher for those receiving psychoeducational videos about BPD. Improvement in BPD knowledge in the psychoeducation conditions was significantly greater than the control condition. No statistically significant differences were found regarding reduction of BPD symptoms. The psychoeducation with feedback arm showed significantly greater improvements in self-impairment compared to controls with medium effect size at the final timepoint. Modeling of the relationship between time spent alone and BPD symptoms showed a positive correlation in the control condition, but in the group receiving both psychoeducation about BPD and feedback, this relationship was negative. Conclusion Online psychoeducational videos and assessment were safe, feasible, and acceptable to participants with newly diagnosed BPD. Psychoeducation with personalized feedback appears to be more effective than either BPD or general psychoeducation alone in improving deficits in self-functioning, which may relate to an increased capacity to be alone with fewer symptoms. The protocol was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05358925, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05358925) on April 28th, 2022.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.3%
2
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
3
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
4
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
7
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.6%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
9
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
10
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
11
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
13
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
15
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
16
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
17
Schizophrenia Bulletin
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
18
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
19
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
20
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.2%
21
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
22
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
26
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
28
Autism Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
29
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
American Journal of Psychiatry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%