Back

Population genomics reveals divergent lineages in the European peatland plant Drosera rotundifolia

Kuprina, K.; Sommer, M.; Kieninger, H.; Zoerner, M.; Schnittler, M.; Bog, M.

2026-05-31 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.05.28.728421 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Genomic variation within populations reflects both past and contemporary evolutionary processes. The genetic structure of the European peatland plant species is shaped by complex postglacial recolonization and recent habitat loss. Here, we investigate population genomic patterns in the vulnerable mire plant, round-leaved sundew (Drosera rotundifolia L.). Using ddRAD sequencing of 311 individuals from 38 populations across Europe, we detected significant genetic differentiation (Fst = 0.02-0.44, p < 0.05) and a consistent deficit of heterozygosity (Fis = 0.248) across populations. In contrast, sequencing of 10,449 bp of chloroplast DNA revealed extremely low variation, with only one SNP detected. Clustering analyses (Admixture and DAPC) both identified pronounced genetic structure comprising three major clusters (Western, Northern, and Eastern) that broadly correspond to European biogeographic regions. Genetic differentiation was partially explained by geographic distance (3.3%; p = 0.0001; Mantel test), while climatic variables, particularly temperature and precipitation, accounted for 2.9% of genomic variation (p < 0.0001; redundancy analysis). The observed pattern is consistent with polygenic responses to climatic gradients and is supported by 1,022 SNPs, distributed across 632 loci, that were significantly associated with environmental variables. Demographic reconstruction revealed distinct evolutionary trajectories among clusters, with the Western cluster showing a more recent expansion. Together, our results suggest that the genetic structure of D. rotundifolia is a result of postglacial recolonization, geographic isolation, and climate influence. We highlight the importance of conserving genetic diversity of D. rotundifolia across all three clusters and accounting for potential local adaptation and population vulnerability in future conservation strategies.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
26.0%
2
Annals of Botany
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.4%
3
Evolutionary Applications
108 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
Heredity
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
5
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
6
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
7
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
8
American Journal of Botany
47 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
9
Journal of Biogeography
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
10
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
11
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
12
Evolution Letters
85 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
13
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
14
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.3%
15
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
16
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
17
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.0%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.0%
19
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
20
Diversity and Distributions
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Journal of Heredity
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
23
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
110 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
Plant Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
25
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.6%