Back

Opioid crisis in Germany? Insights from a cross-sectional nationwide survey within the German drug scene.

Roehrig, J.; Sutter, L.; Witsch, N.; Rademacher, L.; Cabanis, M.

2026-06-01 addiction medicine
10.64898/2026.05.28.26354329 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and Aims: Synthetic opioids cause tens of thousands of deaths each year in North America, and there are indications that synthetic opioids are also becoming increasingly prevalent in the European drug market. This study aimed to examine high-risk substance use in the German drug-using community with a particular focus on the synthetic opioids fentanyl and nitazenes and related awareness, concerns, overdose experiences, and harm-reduction behavior. Design: Cross-sectional, observational online survey. Setting: Open drug-use scenes, addiction clinics, and substitution practices at numerous geographic locations throughout Germany, August to September 2025. Participants: 235 individuals aged 14+ from the drug using community (mean age 43.4 years; 57.9% male), 79.6% recruited by peers in open drug-use scenes. Measurements: The primary outcome was substances used within the past 12 months. In addition, sources, forms, routes of administration, and perceived changes in availability and price of (synthetic) opioids were assessed as well as risk perceptions, fears, harm-reduction behavior, and overdose-related experiences. Findings: 227 respondents reported substance use with an average of 6.2 substances, and 73.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 67.0-78.5%) had used at least one opioid in the past year. Synthetic opioids were consumed in many parts of Germany and across all age and gender groups. Among participants who experienced a shortage of their primary opioid in the past year, 25% (95% CI = 15.8-37.2%) reported having used fentanyl instead. 56.5% (95% CI = 36.8-74.3%) of individuals using synthetic opioids reported having experienced an overdose in the past twelve months. Most of the respondents perceived synthetic opioids as posing a high risk, and a substantial proportion expressed fear that they could be mixed into their own substances. However, only 9.9% (95% CI = 6.6-14.7%) use drug checking, although the vast majority stated they would use it if it were available to them. Conclusions: Synthetic opioids, including fentanyl and nitazenes, have entered the German drug scene, with users reporting high rates of overdose and limited access to harm reduction measures. Germany may be in an early phase of a synthetic opioid transition, warranting urgent expansion of surveillance, naloxone distribution, and drug checking services.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.1%
2
International Journal of Drug Policy
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.1%
3
Addiction
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
4
British Journal of Pharmacology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Addiction Biology
51 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
6
Psychopharmacology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
7
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.3%
8
Journal of Psychopharmacology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
9
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
10
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.7%
11
Neuropsychopharmacology
153 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
12
Addiction Neuroscience
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
13
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.8%
14
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
15
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
16
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
17
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
JAMA Psychiatry
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
19
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
20
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Pain Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
23
The British Journal of Psychiatry
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
24
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%