Back

Locally adaptive conformal prediction intervals for polygenic score-based phenotype prediction via residual normalization and data-driven stratification

Yun, Y.; Hao, X.; Zhang, Y. D.

2026-05-30 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.05.28.26354326 medRxiv
Show abstract

Quantifying uncertainty in polygenic score (PGS)-based phenotype prediction is crucial for the integration of genomic data into precision medicine. While the PGS provides a fundamental pivot for point estimation, clinical decision-making necessitates the construction of well-calibrated prediction intervals that reliably encompass the true phenotypic values. However, phenotypic residuals are frequently characterized by complex heteroscedasticity and stratified variance structures across diverse demographic contexts. Existing approaches often rely on global calibration mechanisms, which fail to account for such localized variance structures and lead to systematic miscalibration within specific subpopulations. To bridge this gap, we propose Clustering-based Split Conformal Prediction with Normalized Residuals (C-SCNR), a versatile framework based on Split Conformal Prediction. By adopting residual normalization and incorporating a repetitive `split-and-cluster` mechanism, C-SCNR dynamically identifies latent error strata and applies fine-grained adjustments to the resulting intervals. Our framework requires no distributional assumptions regarding the phenotype, is compatible with any PGS method, and flexibly accommodates biologically-informed grouping. Simulation studies demonstrate that our framework consistently outperforms existing methods across diverse error distributions. In real-data applications analyzing Body mass index (BMI), Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and High-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol in the UK Biobank, C-SCNR effectively resolves the coverage deficiencies of existing methods in specific subgroups and consistently yields superior localized calibration. Overall, C-SCNR represents a flexible and powerful framework for constructing high-resolution context-specific prediction intervals, thereby facilitating more reliable clinical interpretations of polygenic risk.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.