Back

Within-Patient Comparison of Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in Prostate Cancer: Protocol-Conditional Biodistribution and Quantitative Non-Interchangeability

Kwon, W.-A.; Park, S.; Kim, R.; Lee, W.; Park, C.; Kim, T.-S.; Joung, J. Y.

2026-05-30 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.05.28.26354302 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT is central to prostate cancer staging and theranostic workflows. To our knowledge, no direct within-patient comparison of [18F]FC303 ([18F]Florastamin) and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 has been reported. We performed a preliminary paired method-comparison study under non-harmonized acquisition protocols. Patients and Methods: Twenty patients with histologically confirmed prostate cancer underwent [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (185 +/- 37 MBq, 60 +/- 10 min) followed by [18F]FC303 PET/CT (370 +/- 37 MBq, 105 +/- 15 min) on the same PET/CT system within each patient (median interval, 29.5 days). Index targets were anatomically matched to the biopsied or surgically sampled lesion or target region. The primary malignant set included 18 histologically malignant targets; two histology-negative or indeterminate targets were included only in sensitivity analysis. Fixed [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11-first scan order and the 45-min uptake-time difference were central interpretive constraints. Results: Across five predefined reference organs, [18F]FC303 showed lower SUVmean than [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 (all Benjamini-Hochberg-adjusted p < 0.001; [68Ga]/[18F]FC303 geometric mean ratio [GMR], 1.29-3.89). In the primary malignant set, [18F]FC303 lesion SUVmax was lower than [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 (median, 11.3 vs 18.1; paired median difference, -5.50; 95% CI, -6.85 to -2.90; Wilcoxon p = 8.4 x 10-4), with strong rank correlation (Spearman {rho} = 0.90). Passing-Bablok regression yielded {beta} = 1.13 (95% CI, 1.04-1.45), and log-Bland-Altman GMR (FC303/[68Ga]) was 0.75, consistent with proportional non-interchangeability. Tumor-to-liver and tumor-to-mediastinum ratios did not differ significantly (GMR, 1.17 [95% CI, 0.94-1.45] and 0.96 [0.80-1.15], respectively); the study was not powered for equivalence. The n = 20 sensitivity analysis showed consistent directionality. Conclusions: Under non-harmonized acquisition conditions, [18F]FC303 showed lower physiologic reference-organ SUVmean and malignant target-region SUVmax than [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11, whereas tumor-to-liver and tumor-to-mediastinum ratios were not significantly different. Absolute SUVs were not interchangeable; [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11-derived SUV thresholds should not be directly transferred to [18F]FC303 without tracer-specific calibration.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.3%
2
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
Neuro-Oncology Advances
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.4%
6
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
8
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
9
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
11
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Analytical Biochemistry
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
14
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
15
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
16
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
18
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
20
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
21
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
22
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
23
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%