Back

Diagnosis provision by young people's mental health services: a comparison with epidemiological data

Lewis, S. J.; Meehan, A. J.; Akiba, M.; Arseneault, L.; Byford, S.; Caspi, A.; Clark, B. R.; Downs, J.; Ford, T. J.; Fisher, H. L.; Koenen, K. C.; Moffitt, T. E.; Newbury, J. B.; Odgers, C. L.; Pritchard, M.; Simonoff, E.; Danese, A.

2026-06-05 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.05.28.26354156 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Little is known about the provision of diagnoses to young people with mental health disorders. We investigated diagnosis provision by NHS mental health services, focusing on 17-year-olds in South London between 2009-2024, and compared with estimated disorder prevalence. Methods To examine diagnosis provision in the population, we extracted diagnosis data from records of the NHS mental healthcare provider serving South London, using the Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre Clinical Record Interactive Search application; we then compared these data with the corresponding population size, obtained from the Office for National Statistics. To assess diagnosis provision in those with mental health disorders, we compared diagnosis data with the number of young people estimated to have met criteria for a disorder, derived from epidemiological interview data collected in the Environmental Risk (E-Risk) Longitudinal Twin Study and weighted according to characteristics of 17-year-old South Londoners. To assess diagnosis provision in those with mental health disorders within health services, we compared diagnosis data with the number estimated to have met criteria for a disorder and used any health service for their mental health, again derived from weighted E-Risk Study data. Findings Of 17-year-olds from South London in 2009-2024, 4.0% (n=8,958/223,404) had a diagnosis in mental health records during the previous year. This diagnosis provision covered <1 in 16 of those estimated to have had a mental health disorder, and <1 in 4 of those estimated to have also used health services. Diagnosis provision was lower in girls than boys and in young people with Black/Asian/Mixed/Other ethnicity than those with White ethnicity, in those estimated to have had a mental health disorder and used health services. Interpretation These findings demonstrate gaps and biases in mental health diagnosis provision for young people, including within health services, and reveal the imperative need to strengthen young people's mental healthcare.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.2%
2
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
3
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.2%
5
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.2%
6
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
8
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
9
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
10
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.0%
12
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.0%
13
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
14
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
16
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
17
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
18
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
19
Schizophrenia Bulletin
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
20
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
22
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
23
The Lancet Healthy Longevity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%