Diagnosis provision by young people's mental health services: a comparison with epidemiological data
Lewis, S. J.; Meehan, A. J.; Akiba, M.; Arseneault, L.; Byford, S.; Caspi, A.; Clark, B. R.; Downs, J.; Ford, T. J.; Fisher, H. L.; Koenen, K. C.; Moffitt, T. E.; Newbury, J. B.; Odgers, C. L.; Pritchard, M.; Simonoff, E.; Danese, A.
Show abstract
Background Little is known about the provision of diagnoses to young people with mental health disorders. We investigated diagnosis provision by NHS mental health services, focusing on 17-year-olds in South London between 2009-2024, and compared with estimated disorder prevalence. Methods To examine diagnosis provision in the population, we extracted diagnosis data from records of the NHS mental healthcare provider serving South London, using the Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre Clinical Record Interactive Search application; we then compared these data with the corresponding population size, obtained from the Office for National Statistics. To assess diagnosis provision in those with mental health disorders, we compared diagnosis data with the number of young people estimated to have met criteria for a disorder, derived from epidemiological interview data collected in the Environmental Risk (E-Risk) Longitudinal Twin Study and weighted according to characteristics of 17-year-old South Londoners. To assess diagnosis provision in those with mental health disorders within health services, we compared diagnosis data with the number estimated to have met criteria for a disorder and used any health service for their mental health, again derived from weighted E-Risk Study data. Findings Of 17-year-olds from South London in 2009-2024, 4.0% (n=8,958/223,404) had a diagnosis in mental health records during the previous year. This diagnosis provision covered <1 in 16 of those estimated to have had a mental health disorder, and <1 in 4 of those estimated to have also used health services. Diagnosis provision was lower in girls than boys and in young people with Black/Asian/Mixed/Other ethnicity than those with White ethnicity, in those estimated to have had a mental health disorder and used health services. Interpretation These findings demonstrate gaps and biases in mental health diagnosis provision for young people, including within health services, and reveal the imperative need to strengthen young people's mental healthcare.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Ethnic inequalities in compulsory psychiatric hospital detentions during UK COVID-19 'lockdowns': A Regression Discontinuity Design in time study 96%
- Comparing mental health trajectories of four different types of key workers with non-key workers: A 12-month follow-up observational study of 21,874 adults in England during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- Equal, equitable or exacerbating inequalities? Patterns and predictors of social prescribing referrals in 160,128 UK patients 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Persistent health inequalities over 20 years among adults with intellectual disabilities who display behaviours that challenge: Evidence from English primary care records 94%
- Did social factors buffer against the effect of adversities on self-harm during the COVID-19 pandemic? A longitudinal analysis of 49,227 UK adults 93%
- The impact of the COVID19 pandemic and initial period of lockdown on the mental health and wellbeing of UK adults 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Living alone and mental health: parallel analyses in longitudinal population surveys and electronic health records prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic 95%
- Association of a child’s mental disorder with parental income and employment: Analysis of nationwide register-based cohorts in Finland and Denmark 93%
- Using electronic health records to evaluate a children and young people's social prescribing service: Challenges and implications for research and practice 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 illness severity and 2-year prevalence of physical symptoms: an observational study in Iceland, Sweden, Norway and Denmark 91%
- Socioeconomic inequalities in co-morbidity of overweight, obesity and mental ill-health from adolescence to mid-adulthood in two national birth cohort studies 91%
- Temporal trends in the occurrence, mortality, and cost of brain disorders in Denmark 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of clinically extremely vulnerable children and children living with clinically extremely vulnerable people in Wales: A data linkage study 96%
- Assessing and predicting adolescent and early adulthood common mental disorders in the ALSPAC cohort using electronic primary care data 94%
- Mental health in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: early observations 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.