Back

Multimodal sleep stage classification and label-free abnormality scoring in mid-to-older adults

Nur, Z.; Bijlani, N.; Villarroel, M.

2026-06-05 health informatics
10.64898/2026.05.28.26353980 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Sleep fragmentation and reduced sleep efficiency are markers of disrupted sleep architecture linked to cognitive and age-related decline. Current assessments rely on subjective reports prone to recall bias, limiting their effectiveness for longitudinal monitoring. Data-driven analysis of sleep using physiological signals such as EEG and EMG remains underutilised, particularly in mid-to-older adults. Objective: We present a deep learning pipeline for automated sleep staging and label-free abnormality scoring, with the primary objective of quantifying deviations in sleep architecture to capture progressive sleep disruption and longitudinal change. Methods: Temporal and attention-based models were benchmarked using datasets from the National Sleep Research Resource and PhysioBank. To improve class-specific performance, we introduce a stacking-based ensemble of sleep stage classifiers, each trained to specialise in a different stage. For longitudinal scoring, we develop a reconstruction loss-based abnormality metric using a temporal convolutional autoencoder trained on hypnograms generated by the sleep staging models. Results: Attention-based models, particularly AttnSleep, achieved the highest performance in both multimodal and single-channel settings (accuracy: 0.85 and 0.83; F1: 0.79 and 0.74, respectively). The encoder-decoder ensemble model improved overall classification accuracy by 3% compared to the best-performing biased base classifier, with a modest gain in N1-stage F1 score (0.444). The proposed abnormality score correlated with Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index components and showed sensitivity to synthetic hypnogram degradation, highlighting its potential as a label-free indicator of sleep disruption. Conclusion: Automated classification and annotation-free scoring enable an end-to-end multimodal pipeline that supports scalable, objective sleep health monitoring, with relevance for future clinical deployment.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Sleep Research
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.6%
3
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.0%
4
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
5.0%
5
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
6
Sleep
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Sleep Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
8
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.9%
10
SLEEP
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
11
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
12
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
13
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
14
Journal of Biological Rhythms
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
15
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
16
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
18
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Experimental Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.7%
28
Movement Disorders
62 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
30
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%