Back

Multispecies Mixtures: An Individual-Centered Quantitative Genetic Framework for Complex Plant Neighborhoods

Salas, N.; Montazeaud, G.; Bourke, P. M.; Baranger, A.; David, J.

2026-05-29 genetics
10.64898/2026.05.27.728303 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Modern agriculture faces major sustainability challenges, including stagnating yields, dependence on fossil resources, and severe environmental impacts. Increasing intra- and interspecific diversity within plots through agroecological design is a promising method for enhancing crop productivity and stability. However, mixed-crop performance remains highly variable, and the genetic architecture of interactions within heterogeneous canopies is poorly understood. Two quantitative genetic frameworks have been proposed: trait-based models, which describe how interacting traits shape phenotypes, and variance-based models, which treat neighbor genotype effects as "black-box" social effects. However, existing variance-based models have been developed almost exclusively for intraspecific interactions and simple neighborhoods. We propose a general multispecies framework describing how a focal plants phenotype and total breeding value arise from its own direct effects and from the indirect effects of conspecific and heterospecific neighbors. We derived analytical expressions for phenotypic variance, inter-individual covariance, total breeding value variance, and relative heritable variance, which explicitly account for spatial structure, relatedness, and environmental similarities. Using a two-species alternating-row field layout and extensive simulations based on flexible variance-covariance structures, we evaluated the statistical power and bias of joint mixed-model estimators of direct and indirect genetic and environmental effects under a wide range of parameter combinations. Our results show that accurate separation of direct and indirect effects depends on trait heritability and replication, and that modeling genetic covariances across effects and species substantially improves estimation accuracy. This framework provides a unified, individual-centered basis for analyzing complex multispecies neighborhoods and quantifying the breeding potential of plant communities. Article SummaryGrowing several crop species or varieties together in the same field can boost yield and stability, but the outcome is unpredictable and the genetic causes remain unclear. We developed a theoritical & statistical framework that links each plants performance to its own genes and to those of its neighbors, both from the same and from a different species. Computer simulations of a two-species field showed that these direct and neighbor-driven genetic effects can be reliably separated when enough plants are measured per variety. The framework opens the way to breeding crop mixtures that perform well specifically when grown alongside another species.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.3%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 13%
13.3%
3
in silico Plants
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
5
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.3%
7
G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
8
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
9
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
10
Evolutionary Applications
108 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
11
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.8%
14
Heredity
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
American Journal of Botany
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
17
Crop Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
18
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
19
The Plant Genome
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
20
BMC Plant Biology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.1%
22
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
23
AoB PLANTS
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
24
Genetics Selection Evolution
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
25
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.0%
26
Quantitative Plant Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%