Back

Hindmarsh-Rose neuronal network with spike-timing-dependent plasticity demonstrates coordinated reset neuromodulation

Sharafi, S.; Gilmer, J.; Al Borno, M.; Uchida, T. K.

2026-06-01 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.05.27.728228 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Computational models of brain structures impacted by Parkinsons disease are useful for exploring potential therapies. We use the Hindmarsh-Rose neuronal model to simulate synchronized activity in the subthalamic nucleus, capturing key features of the pathological rhythms observed in Parkinsons disease using a relatively small network of 100 neurons. Our model incorporates unidirectional excitatory chemical synapses whose strengths evolve according to a spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) rule. To account for inputs from unmodelled neurons, both uniformly distributed white noise and Poisson noise were explored. White noise produced a single stable state of synchronized neuronal activity whereas Poisson noise resulted in two stable states, one synchronized and one desynchronized. We applied coordinated reset stimulation with a rapidly varying sequence (RVS CR) to examine its ability to reduce neuronal synchrony. The neuronal population was divided into subpopulations representing distinct physical sites of stimulation, as in deep brain stimulation therapy, and phase-shifted stimuli were delivered to each subpopulation in a random sequence. We explored how stimulation frequency and the number of stimulation sites affect the efficacy of RVS CR at desynchronizing the network. We demonstrate that RVS CR efficacy is sensitive to the depression-to-potentiation ratio in the STDP rule, which may be an important parameter to tune when reconciling simulations with experimental data. Numerical simulation of neuronal networks is constrained by computational resources when models demand large networks. This work proposes a model that demonstrates similar utility with a relatively small network, enabling researchers to study pathological neuronal activity and treatments more efficiently.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 1%
18.6%
2
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
3
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
4
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.4%
5
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.3%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
8
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.9%
9
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
11
Neural Computation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
12
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
16
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
17
Cognitive Neurodynamics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
18
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
20
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
21
Neurocomputing
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
22
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.9%
24
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
28
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
29
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
Neural Networks
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%