Ratio Percentile Deviation (RPD): A nonparametric, compositionally robust method for measuring the divergence of a microbial sample from a reference dataset
Herren, C. M.
Show abstract
Comparing a microbial sample against a reference dataset is essential for many workflows, such as quantifying change in a microbial community after experimental perturbation or evaluating whether a human microbiome sample falls within the range of healthy subjects. Here I present a new method called Ratio Percentile Deviation (RPD) for quantifying the divergence of a microbial sample from a set of reference samples. The RPD method compares features of the test samples to the empirical distribution of features in the reference samples, making no assumption about the underlying distribution of the data. The features used for comparison are ratios between taxa in the same sample, which are invariant between count and relative abundance data; therefore, RPD is appropriate for compositional read-based data. Applying the RPD method to several large microbial datasets shows that it outperforms approaches that compare test samples to a composite reference value (e.g. the centroid of the reference dataset). In case-control analyses using the American Gut Project and Ghana Breast Health datasets, a single RPD predictor discriminated individuals with microbiome dysfunction from healthy controls with AUCs of 0.74-0.79; DeLong tests confirmed RPDs AUC was significantly higher than the best-performing comparator in all three analyses. I further show that RPD can measure compositional variation within a dataset by applying the metric to the long-term Lake Mendota microbial timeseries. The superior predictive power of RPD versus existing approaches across these varied datasets suggest that this method could be a useful new tool for comparing microbial samples to a reference across multiple study systems. The RPD method is available as an R function in the following github repository: https://github.com/cherren8/RPD
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A mixed model approach for estimating drivers of microbiota community composition and differential taxonomic abundance 96%
- Predicting the presence and abundance of bacterial taxa in environmental communities through flow cytometric fingerprinting 95%
- Measurement error and resolution in quantitative stable isotope probing: implications for experimental design 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ensuring that fundamentals of quantitative microbiology are reflected in microbial diversity analyses based on next-generation sequencing 97%
- Spatiotemporal and ontogenetic variation, microbial selection, and predicted antifungal function in the skin-associated microbiome of a Rocky Mountain amphibian 95%
- Rarefaction, alpha diversity, and statistics 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Iroki: automatic customization and visualization of phylogenetic trees 95%
- Investigation of microbial community interactions between lake Washington methanotrophs using genome-scale metabolic modeling 94%
- Optimised biomolecular extraction for metagenomic analysis of microbial biofilms from high-mountain streams 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Waste not, want not: Revisiting the analysis that called into question the practice of rarefaction 96%
- Ecological Observations Based on Functional Gene Sequencing Are Sensitive to the Amplicon Processing Method 94%
- A quantitative approach to measure and predict microbiome response to antibiotics 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.