Back

Design and structure of protein cages based on helical fusion and machine learning

San Segundo-Acosta, P.; Le Coq, J.; Boskovic, J.; Aglietti, R. A.; Bowers, P.; Yeates, T. O.; Castells-Graells, R.

2026-05-29 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.05.27.727936 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Self-assembling protein cages are versatile nanoscale architectures with broad applications in drug delivery, vaccine development, and structural biology. Historically, two main strategies have been used to construct such cages: genetic fusion of oligomeric domains connected by helical linkers, and computational interface design using either physics-based or machine learning-based methods. Here, we extend the original fusion approach using modern AI algorithms and more sophisticated treatments of helix bending to create protein cages with novel architectures composed exclusively of trimeric building blocks arranged in tetrahedral symmetry. Of fifteen designs tested experimentally, multiple sequence variants of two of these designs assembled predominantly into soluble, monodisperse particles of the expected size, with native molecular masses of 633 kDa (T33-Fus-1A, B) and 638 kDa (T33-Fus-2). Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures of three distinct sequence variants spanning from 3.0-3.9 [A] in resolution confirmed the intended structures in atomic detail, with C-alpha RSMD values over the entire assemblies as low as 2 [A]. The predicted modes of helix bending were similarly validated. The results highlight the impact of methodological improvements for achieving a level of regularity and design precision that has largely evaded prior applications of the fusion approach. These findings expand the prospects and accessible design space for self-assembling protein nanomaterials.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.4%
2
Communications Chemistry
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.7%
3
Biomacromolecules
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
4
Protein Science
246 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.1%
5
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
93 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.1%
6
ACS Nano
113 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.4%
7
Nanoscale
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
8
Journal of the American Chemical Society
217 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 20%
2.6%
10
Small
78 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.6%
11
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
167 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.3%
12
ChemBioChem
55 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
13
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
14
Chemical Science
73 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
15
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.9%
16
Nature Chemistry
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
17
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
18
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.6%
19
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.6%
20
Structure
193 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
21
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
22
Langmuir
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
23
Cell Reports Physical Science
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
24
Nano Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
25
Journal of Molecular Biology
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
26
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.0%
27
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
76 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
ACS Synthetic Biology
287 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Chemical Communications
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
30
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%