Back

Using artificial intelligence for radiotherapy clinical trial quality assurance: analysis of a multi-institutional clinical trial for neurovascular-sparing prostate stereotactic ablative radiotherapy

Doucette, M.; Zhang, Y.; Liao, C.-Y.; Lin, M.-H.; Yan, Y.; Dess, R. T.; Tendulkar, R. D.; Garant, A.; Hannan, R.; Jiang, S.; Nguyen, D.; Desai, N.; Yang, D. X.

2026-05-29 health informatics
10.64898/2026.05.27.26354252 medRxiv
Show abstract

Our study evaluated whether a deep learning auto segmentation model combined with machine learning triage can streamline radiotherapy clinical trial quality assurance (QA). We analyzed 107 stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) cases from a multi-institutional phase II clinical trial of neurovascular sparing prostate SABR, focusing on physician contours of the internal pudendal artery (IPA) as a novel organ-at-risk with substantial interobserver variability. Contours were scored by the trial principal investigator as Per-Protocol or Minor Deviation/Unacceptable. We applied a deep learning model for IPA auto-segmentation. Agreement between human and AI contours was then quantified using 14 overlap, distance, and surface metrics, and a supervised classifier was trained on these metrics to flag clinical trial protocol deviations. While AI segmentation achieved only modest geometric accuracy with mean Dice similarity coefficient of 0.446 and 95th percentile Hausdorff distance of 14.23, when incorporating all 14 metrics, a machine learning classifier yielded AUROC of 0.836, flagging all Minor Deviation/Unacceptable cases with 100% sensitivity on the 27 case hold-out set with 6 false positives and no false negatives. AI segmentation combined with metrics-based machine learning can triage protocol deviations within a multi-institution radiotherapy clinical trial, supporting prospective evaluation of AI-assisted trial QA.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.5%
2
Radiotherapy and Oncology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
3
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 6%
8.1%
5
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.2%
7
Annals of Internal Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
8
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.3%
9
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 7%
3.3%
10
European Journal of Cancer
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
11
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.2%
12
Clinical and Translational Science
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
13
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
14
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
15
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
16
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
18
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.9%
19
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
21
Journal of Infection
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
22
BMC Medical Research Methodology
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%