Using artificial intelligence for radiotherapy clinical trial quality assurance: analysis of a multi-institutional clinical trial for neurovascular-sparing prostate stereotactic ablative radiotherapy
Doucette, M.; Zhang, Y.; Liao, C.-Y.; Lin, M.-H.; Yan, Y.; Dess, R. T.; Tendulkar, R. D.; Garant, A.; Hannan, R.; Jiang, S.; Nguyen, D.; Desai, N.; Yang, D. X.
Show abstract
Our study evaluated whether a deep learning auto segmentation model combined with machine learning triage can streamline radiotherapy clinical trial quality assurance (QA). We analyzed 107 stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) cases from a multi-institutional phase II clinical trial of neurovascular sparing prostate SABR, focusing on physician contours of the internal pudendal artery (IPA) as a novel organ-at-risk with substantial interobserver variability. Contours were scored by the trial principal investigator as Per-Protocol or Minor Deviation/Unacceptable. We applied a deep learning model for IPA auto-segmentation. Agreement between human and AI contours was then quantified using 14 overlap, distance, and surface metrics, and a supervised classifier was trained on these metrics to flag clinical trial protocol deviations. While AI segmentation achieved only modest geometric accuracy with mean Dice similarity coefficient of 0.446 and 95th percentile Hausdorff distance of 14.23, when incorporating all 14 metrics, a machine learning classifier yielded AUROC of 0.836, flagging all Minor Deviation/Unacceptable cases with 100% sensitivity on the 27 case hold-out set with 6 false positives and no false negatives. AI segmentation combined with metrics-based machine learning can triage protocol deviations within a multi-institution radiotherapy clinical trial, supporting prospective evaluation of AI-assisted trial QA.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.