Back

Nicotine pouch adverts reach ten times more young men than women: targeting and reach on Meta social media platforms in the UK

Sun, H.; Jackson, S. E.; Xiao, L.; Cox, S.; Oldham, M.; Tattan-Birch, H. O.

2026-05-28 public and global health
10.64898/2026.05.27.26354221 medRxiv
Show abstract

Abstract Aims To examine which demographic groups nicotine pouch advertisers chose to target on social media, and which groups Meta's algorithms actually delivered the adverts to. Design Cross-sectional analysis of advert-level data from the Meta Ad Library. Setting Meta social media platforms (including Facebook and Instagram) in the UK. Cases A random sample of 741 nicotine pouch adverts shown in the 12 months up to December 2025, and a comparison sample of 1,125 general adverts. Analyses of reach were restricted to adverts eligible for all genders and adult ages (444 pouch adverts; 674 general). Measurements Outcomes were advertiser-set gender and age-group targeting criteria (i.e., groups eligible to be shown each advert) and estimated advert reach to each group (i.e., number of people who saw each advert). Male-to-female reach ratios within age groups, and reach ratios comparing age groups, were calculated per advert and summarised using geometric means. To assess whether patterns were pouch-specific, comparisons with general adverts were made using ratios of reach ratios (RRR). Findings Advertisers of nicotine pouches targeted a broad sample; most adverts (79.1%; 586/741) were eligible to be shown to all genders, the remainder were restricted to men only. All were restricted to adults (minimum age 18 years) and most (95.6%; 708/741) had no upper age limit. Despite this, of pouch adverts eligible to be shown to all adults, adverts were more likely to reach men, particularly among younger men. Among 18-24-year-olds, pouch adverts reached around ten times as many men as women (RR 10.0, 95% CI 8.7-11.5), compared with a slight skew towards women for general adverts (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.71-0.94), corresponding to an RRR of 12.3 (95% CI 10.0-15.1). Pouch adverts also showed a skew in reach towards younger age groups. Relative to those aged 35-44 years, reach was higher among 18-24-year-olds for nicotine pouch adverts (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.17-1.51) but much lower for general adverts (RR 0.19, 95% CI 0.17-0.21), corresponding to an RRR of 7.0 (95% CI 6.0-8.2). Conclusions Nicotine pouch adverts on social media are often eligible to be shown broadly to all demographic groups but are disproportionately delivered to young men.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Addiction
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.5%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.1%
3
Nicotine and Tobacco Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.8%
5
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.9%
6
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
7
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
9
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
10
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
11
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
13
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
14
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
16
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
17
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
18
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
19
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
20
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
24
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
25
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
26
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 78%
0.6%