Back

Nicotine pouch adverts reach ten times more young men than women: targeting and reach on Meta social media platforms in the UK

Sun, H.; Jackson, S. E.; Xiao, L.; Cox, S.; Oldham, M.; Tattan-Birch, H. O.

2026-05-28 public and global health
10.64898/2026.05.27.26354221 medRxiv
Show abstract

Abstract Aims To examine which demographic groups nicotine pouch advertisers chose to target on social media, and which groups Meta's algorithms actually delivered the adverts to. Design Cross-sectional analysis of advert-level data from the Meta Ad Library. Setting Meta social media platforms (including Facebook and Instagram) in the UK. Cases A random sample of 741 nicotine pouch adverts shown in the 12 months up to December 2025, and a comparison sample of 1,125 general adverts. Analyses of reach were restricted to adverts eligible for all genders and adult ages (444 pouch adverts; 674 general). Measurements Outcomes were advertiser-set gender and age-group targeting criteria (i.e., groups eligible to be shown each advert) and estimated advert reach to each group (i.e., number of people who saw each advert). Male-to-female reach ratios within age groups, and reach ratios comparing age groups, were calculated per advert and summarised using geometric means. To assess whether patterns were pouch-specific, comparisons with general adverts were made using ratios of reach ratios (RRR). Findings Advertisers of nicotine pouches targeted a broad sample; most adverts (79.1%; 586/741) were eligible to be shown to all genders, the remainder were restricted to men only. All were restricted to adults (minimum age 18 years) and most (95.6%; 708/741) had no upper age limit. Despite this, of pouch adverts eligible to be shown to all adults, adverts were more likely to reach men, particularly among younger men. Among 18-24-year-olds, pouch adverts reached around ten times as many men as women (RR 10.0, 95% CI 8.7-11.5), compared with a slight skew towards women for general adverts (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.71-0.94), corresponding to an RRR of 12.3 (95% CI 10.0-15.1). Pouch adverts also showed a skew in reach towards younger age groups. Relative to those aged 35-44 years, reach was higher among 18-24-year-olds for nicotine pouch adverts (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.17-1.51) but much lower for general adverts (RR 0.19, 95% CI 0.17-0.21), corresponding to an RRR of 7.0 (95% CI 6.0-8.2). Conclusions Nicotine pouch adverts on social media are often eligible to be shown broadly to all demographic groups but are disproportionately delivered to young men.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nicotine and Tobacco Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
2
Addiction
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.8%
3
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.8%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 22%
7.8%
5
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.2%
6
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.1%
7
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
8
Thorax
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
9
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
10
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
11
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.4%
12
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
13
Preventive Medicine Reports
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
14
Drug Safety
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
16
BMJ Public Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
17
Eurosurveillance
83 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
18
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
20
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
21
International Journal of Drug Policy
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
22
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
23
JMIR Formative Research
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
24
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
25
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
41 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
26
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
27
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
28
European Journal of Public Health
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
29
Psychological Medicine
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%