Back

Acute effect of high-intensity interval training on fetal blood flow distribution

Skarstad, H. M. S.; Skrede, S.; La Haganes, K.; Ashby, E. R.; Sujan, M. A. J.; Deibele, K. U.; Morch, H.; Haugen, G. N.; Salvesen, K. A.; Moholdt, T.

2026-05-28 sports medicine
10.64898/2026.05.27.26354197 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objectives To examine the acute effects of a single bout of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on fetal blood flow distribution during the third trimester of pregnancy. Methods Thirty-four healthy pregnant participants (mean age 31.6 years, standard deviation (SD) 4.1; gestational week 33.8 (SD 0.4) completed eight 30-second high-intensity cycling work-bouts interspersed with 2-minute rest periods. Fetal heart rate (FHR), maternal blood pressure, and Doppler-derived blood flow indices in the middle cerebral artery, umbilical artery and vein, and ductus venosus were assessed before and after exercise. We estimated fetal liver blood flow and the ratio of umbilical vein flow to ductus venosus. Maternal heart rate (HR) and FHR were recorded throughout exercise. Paired t-tests compared pre- and post-exercise values. Results No significant changes were observed in fetal blood flow indices or distribution following exercise. Average maternal HR and FHR during the work-bouts were 158 bpm (SD 16) and 152 bpm (SD 12), respectively. Following HIIT, maternal systolic blood pressure increased by 5 mmHg (95% CI 1 to 8, p=.014), maternal HR by 22 bpm (95% CI 15 to 28, p<.001), and FHR by 13 bpm (95% CI 10 to 17, p<.001). We recorded 16 instances of FHR above normal range during HIIT. Conclusion A single HIIT session in late pregnancy increased maternal blood pressure and HR and transiently elevated FHR but did not affect fetal blood flow indices or distribution. Brief episodes of fetal tachycardia were observed but appeared to be clinically insignificant. Future research should investigate the effects of repeated HIIT exposure during pregnancy.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.8%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.5%
3
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
5
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.1%
7
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.7%
8
Obesity
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
9
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
10
Physiology & Behavior
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
11
American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
12
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
13
BMC Nephrology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
14
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
15
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
16
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
17
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
19
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
20
European Journal of Applied Physiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
21
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
22
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%