A Bibliometric and Content Analysis of Exercise Interventions Research in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic inflammatory disorder in which exercise is increasingly recognized as an important component of long-term management. Yet, most reviews in this field evaluate the effects of single exercise modalities, while bibliometric studies primarily identify publication trends and research hotspots without showing whether highly visible themes also represent coherent and comparatively mature evidence domains. Methods: We searched the Web of Science Core Collection for publications on exercise interventions in rheumatoid arthritis from 2016 to 2025. CiteSpace (6.4.1) and VOSviewer (1.6.20) were used to analyze publication growth, collaboration networks, keyword co-occurrence, thematic clusters, and burst terms. We then applied structured content coding in Excel 2021 to classify exercise modalities, outcome domains, and mechanistic topics, and integrated these findings into a visual evidence-distribution profile. Results: Publication output increased from 16 studies in 2016 to 37 in 2025. The United States led in productivity, Karolinska Institutet was the most prolific institution, and Kitas, Duda, and Metsios were among the most influential authors. Keyword analyses identified a shift from function- and disease-focused themes toward quality of life, risk factors, and comprehensive management. The integrated analysis revealed an uneven evidence structure: aerobic and resistance training accounted for the most concentrated and recurrently studied exercise-outcome domains, whereas mind-body and water-based interventions formed visible but methodologically heterogeneous clusters. Newer modalities, including blood flow restriction training and high-intensity interval training, showed growing prominence but limited depth of evidence. Conclusion:Exercise research in rheumatoid arthritis has evolved toward broader and more patient-centered management targets, but the field remains imbalanced across intervention types and outcome domains. This study demonstrates the value of combining bibliometric mapping with structured content analysis to distinguish thematic visibility from evidentiary coherence in heterogeneous intervention fields and may offer a transferable analytical framework for research evaluation beyond rheumatoid arthritis. Keywords: Rheumatoid Arthritis; Exercise Intervention; Bibliometrics; Content Analysis; Rehabilitation