Investigating the Readability, Visual Design, and Quality of Online Written Pharmacogenomics Health Information for Health Consumers in Australia
Giblett, M. J.; Babikian, Y.; Jhala, D. J.; Medland, S. E.
Show abstract
Pharmacogenomics (PGx) offers a pathway towards personalised medicine, which relies on health consumer involvement in making informed decisions. As consumers increasingly seek health information online, high-quality digital resources are essential to support informed consent and shared decision making. The complexity of PGx and widespread limitations in health literacy raise concerns about whether existing consumer-facing online PGx resources are understandable and sufficiently comprehensive. This study evaluates the readability, visual design, and informational quality of publicly available online written PGx health information. Twenty-three webpages met inclusion criteria. The mean readability corresponded to approximately 15 years of formal education (university level), substantially exceeding the Australian Government's recommended Year 7 reading level for public health materials. Informational quality was generally low, with most webpages being rated as poor or very poor. In contrast, visual design quality was relatively strong, with webpages achieving on average around three-quarters of the criteria. Although the visual presentation of PGx webpages is generally professional, their high reading difficulty and limited discussion of treatment choices and uncertainties reduce their usefulness for health consumer education. Improving readability, clearly communicating risks and limitations, and incorporating decision-support features may enhance the ability of online resources to support informed consent and shared decision making.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving Patient Engagement in Phase 2 Clinical Trials with a Trial-specific Patient Decision Aid (tPDA): A Development and Usability Study 93%
- Has the pandemic enhanced and sustained digital health-seeking behaviour? A big data interrupted time-series analysis of Google Trends 92%
- Understanding how the design and implementation of Online Consultations influence primary care outcomes: Systematic review of evidence with recommendations for designers, providers, and researchers 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Defining Destigmatizing Design Guidelines for Use in Sexual Health-Related Digital Technologies: A Delphi Study 92%
- Ethical review of clinical research with generative AI: Evaluating ChatGPT’s accuracy and reproducibility 92%
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhancing Uploads of Health Data in the Electronic Health Record - The Role of Framing and Length of Privacy Information 91%
- How suitable are clinical vignettes for the evaluation of symptom checker apps? A test theoretical perspective 91%
- Validating a Clinical Decision Support System for Palliative Care using healthcare professionals’ insights 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Connecting Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Challenges: Findings from a Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Consultation 92%
- Measures of socioeconomic advantage are not independent predictors of support for healthcare AI: subgroup analysis of a national Australian survey 91%
- User Testing of a Diagnostic Decision Support System with Machine-assisted Chart Review to Facilitate Clinical Genomic Diagnosis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating the Clinical Feasibility of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Clinical Decision Support System: A Longitudinal Feasibility Study 93%
- (Mis) Communicating The Gut Microbiome: A Cross-Sectional Assessment of Social Media Video Content 92%
- Applications and barriers to use of an mHealth iPhone application for self-management of chronic recurrent medical conditions: A Pilot Study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.