Back

Investigating the Readability, Visual Design, and Quality of Online Written Pharmacogenomics Health Information for Health Consumers in Australia

Giblett, M. J.; Babikian, Y.; Jhala, D. J.; Medland, S. E.

2026-05-29 health informatics
10.64898/2026.05.27.26354169 medRxiv
Show abstract

Pharmacogenomics (PGx) offers a pathway towards personalised medicine, which relies on health consumer involvement in making informed decisions. As consumers increasingly seek health information online, high-quality digital resources are essential to support informed consent and shared decision making. The complexity of PGx and widespread limitations in health literacy raise concerns about whether existing consumer-facing online PGx resources are understandable and sufficiently comprehensive. This study evaluates the readability, visual design, and informational quality of publicly available online written PGx health information. Twenty-three webpages met inclusion criteria. The mean readability corresponded to approximately 15 years of formal education (university level), substantially exceeding the Australian Government's recommended Year 7 reading level for public health materials. Informational quality was generally low, with most webpages being rated as poor or very poor. In contrast, visual design quality was relatively strong, with webpages achieving on average around three-quarters of the criteria. Although the visual presentation of PGx webpages is generally professional, their high reading difficulty and limited discussion of treatment choices and uncertainties reduce their usefulness for health consumer education. Improving readability, clearly communicating risks and limitations, and incorporating decision-support features may enhance the ability of online resources to support informed consent and shared decision making.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
2
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.2%
3
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
5
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.8%
7
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
9
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
10
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
11
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.3%
12
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
13
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
14
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
15
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
16
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.3%
17
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.2%
19
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
20
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
25
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
26
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
27
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%