Stratified evaluation of blood RNA sequencing in a rare disease cohort

Background: RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) is increasingly recognized as a complementary tool to DNA-based sequencing for improving the diagnostic yield in Mendelian disorders. However, how the diagnostic performance of RNA-seq varies across molecularly and phenotypically distinct patient subgroups remains poorly defined. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the diagnostic utility of RNA-seq across three stratified groups of patients with non-diagnostic exome sequencing. Methods: We performed RNA-seq on whole blood samples from 90 patients with suspected Mendelian disease in whom clinical exome or whole-exome sequencing had failed to establish a molecular diagnosis. Patients were prospectively stratified into three groups of 30: (i) patients with a candidate variant of uncertain significance (VUS) with predicted splicing impact (Group 1), (ii) patients with a specific clinical pre-diagnosis but no identified pathogenic variant (Group 2), and (iii) patients without a specific pre-diagnosis or candidate variant (Group 3). Aberrant splicing, gene expression outliers, and allele-specific expression were analyzed using multiple bioinformatic tools and compared against a GTEx-derived control cohort. Results: RNA-seq contributed to a molecular diagnosis in 29 of 88 evaluable patients (32.9%). Diagnostic yield differed substantially across groups: 82.8% (24/29) in Group 1, 6.9% (2/29) in Group 2, and 10% (3/30) in Group 3. In Group 1, RNA-seq enabled reclassification of candidate VUS through direct demonstration of aberrant splicing events. In Group 2, RNA-seq identified a somatic mosaic ACTB variant missed by exome sequencing and reclassified a previously deprioritized APPL1 VUS. In Group 3, a deep intronic pseudoexon-activating variant in IGBP1 was identified in two siblings with severe microcephaly, providing evidence for a candidate X-linked microcephaly gene, and a pathogenic RNU4-2 variant was detected in a patient with ReNU syndrome, a non-protein-coding gene not captured by standard exome sequencing. Conclusions: RNA-seq has the highest diagnostic utility when applied to evaluate candidate splice variants identified by prior DNA testing but also provides independent diagnostic value in patients without candidate variants. The systematic comparison across stratified patient groups supports the integration of RNA-seq into clinical genomic workflows and highlights the need for standardized analytic frameworks.