Back

VNtyper 2 enables open-access short-read genotyping of MUC1 VNTR variants in ADTKD at high-speed

Popp, B.; Saei, H.; Teltsh, O.; Janousek, V.; Pristoupilova, A.; Vrbacka, A.; Hartmannova, H.; Kidd, K.; Helmuth, J.; Bleyer, A. J.; Wiesener, M.; Fausch, K.; Rowan, C.; Hassan, E. E.; Clince, M.; Cavalleri, G.; Locher, M.; Eckardt, K.-U.; Richter-Pechanska, P.; ADTKD-Net Consortium, ; Kmoch, S.; Antignac, C.; Conlon, P.; Dorval, G.; Zivna, M.; Halbritter, J.

2026-06-03 nephrology
10.64898/2026.05.27.26352937 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: ADTKD-MUC1 is one of the major entities of ADTKD caused by frameshift variants in the MUC1 VNTR that standard short-read sequencing fails to detect. Existing 59dupC-targeted probe-extension assays do not allow for broad screening and cannot detect atypical non-dupC variants. Recently, VNtyper, a Kestrel-based genotyping pipeline with optional code-adVNTR cross-validation for MUC1 VNTR genotyping from short-read sequencing data allowed to circumvent this diagnostic limitation, but needed further development for easy access and rapid sample processing. Methods: We developed VNtyper 2, by refactoring VNtyper into a modular, production-grade tool with a companion web platform, VNtyper-Online (https://vntyper.org), for freely available browser-based analysis with short turnaround time and without local bioinformatics infrastructure. We validated VNtyper 2 on 400 simulated samples generated with MucOneUp and 142 clinical exomes with independently confirmed genotypes. Results: In simulation, VNtyper 2 detected the canonical 59dupC variant with 96% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Reference-standard validation on 142 samples yielded 90.6% sensitivity and 98.2% specificity overall, with cohort-dependent performance across the Twist Exome v2 French-German cohort (98% sensitivity, 87.5% specificity) and the KAPA HyperExome V2 (Roche) Czech-US cohort (79.4% sensitivity, 100% specificity). Screening of 3582 exomes and targeted panels from international CKD referral programmes identified 51 positive individuals, including 9 with atypical non-dupC frameshift variants that would have been missed by 59dupC-targeted probe-extension assays. In unselected CKD cohorts, a descriptive random-effects summary estimated a detection rate of 1.4% (95% CI 0.6 to 3.1%). Conclusions: VNtyper 2 and VNtyper-Online are open-source tools for MUC1 VNTR genotyping from short-read data and can support locally validated workflows when VNTR coverage is adequate. By improving accessibility and turnaround time, these tools democratize MUC1 diagnostics at global scale. For its integration into routine diagnostics, we propose an expert-informed two-pathway workflow developed through European ADTKD-Net consortium consensus.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Kidney International Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
2
Kidney360
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
3
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.5%
4
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.5%
5
Kidney International
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
6
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
8
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.7%
9
Diabetologia
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
10
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
11
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.1%
12
BMC Nephrology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
13
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
52 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
14
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
17
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.7%
18
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
19
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
20
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
21
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
26
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Human Genetics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
28
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
29
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
30
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%