Back

MyoPath: A Deep Learning Pipeline for Objective Morphometric Assessment of Skeletal Muscle Biopsies

Zhong, H.; Gao, M.; Ma, S.; Zhang, W.; Chen, N.; Jiao, K.; Zhu, B.; Song, J.; Yan, C.; Yue, D.; Xi, J.; Zhu, W.; Zhao, C.; Luo, S.

2026-06-03 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.05.27.26349805 medRxiv
Show abstract

Histopathological evaluation of skeletal muscle biopsies relies on subjective, semi-quantitative assessment with no standardized grading system. We developed a four-tissue deep learning segmentation pipeline using Cellpose-SAM for myofiber instance segmentation, a pixel classifier for fat infiltration, and watershed detection for nuclei. We applied this pipeline to 478 H&E whole-slide images from two independent cohorts: HuashanMuscle (n = 79; China; myotonic dystrophy type 1 [DM1], n = 28; limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type R1 [LGMDR1, calpainopathy], n = 12; type R2 [LGMDR2, dysferlinopathy], n = 22; controls, n = 17) and GTEx (n = 399; United States; three-level myopathy spectrum). Thirty-seven unique morphometric features were extracted per sample. Nuclear centralization index (NCI) and fiber size variability coefficient (fiber CV) discriminated myopathy from controls (p = 1.3E-05, rank-biserial r = 0.69; and p = 2.9E-04, r = 0.58, respectively). DM1 showed the highest NCI (median 0.121), consistent with its centronuclear pathology, and NCI correlated with CTG repeat count (Spearman rho = 0.46, p = 0.042, n = 20). In the GTEx cohort, both biomarkers exhibited significant dose-response trends across the myopathy spectrum (Jonckheere-Terpstra p < E-04). The MyoPath Score, a logistic regression composite of seven pathology indicators trained on GTEx, achieved AUC = 0.788 (LOO-CV 0.735) and transferred to the independent HuashanMuscle cohort with AUC = 0.873 without retraining. Segmentation achieved Dice coefficients of 0.92 (myofiber), 0.95 (fat), 0.87 (nucleus), and 0.88 (connective tissue), with intraclass correlation coefficients exceeding 0.88. NCI and fiber CV provide objective, reproducible quantitative biomarkers for skeletal muscle pathology severity assessment with potential as standardized grading criteria and clinical trial endpoints.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
29.0%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 9%
15.0%
3
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.8%
5
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
6
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
7
Molecular Therapy
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 40%
1.8%
9
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
10
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
11
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
12
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
13
Skeletal Muscle
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
14
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.8%
15
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
16
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
18
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
19
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
20
Acta Neuropathologica
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
22
Cell Death Discovery
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Acta Neuropathologica Communications
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
npj Regenerative Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
26
Stem Cell Reports
118 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
27
Circulation Research
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.5%
29
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%