Back

Passive Acoustic Monitoring within the Northwest Forest Plan Area: 2025 Annual Report

Lesmeister, D. B.; Jenkins, J.; Ruff, Z.; Rugg, N.; Abidari, S.; Beavers, S.; Christophersen, R.; Davis, R. J.; Terwilliger, M.; Henderson, A.; Henson, B.; Kasper, J.; McCafferty, C.; Press, D.; Reffler, S.; Swingle, J.; Thomas, A.; Wert, K.

2026-05-29 ecology
10.64898/2026.05.26.727992 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) Passive Acoustic Monitoring (PAM) program is a large-scale interagency biodiversity monitoring framework designed to assess the status and trends of northern spotted owls (Strix occidentalis caurina), barred owls (Strix varia), marbled murrelets (Brachyramphus marmoratus), and broader forest biodiversity across federally administered lands in the Pacific Northwest. In 2025, we deployed autonomous recording units at 2,095 sampling stations within 532 5-km2 hexagons randomly selected across approximately 24 million acres of federal forest lands in Washington, Oregon, and California. These deployments generated 1.37 million hours of acoustic recordings that we processed using the convolutional neural network PNW-Cnet v5 for automated species identification and subsequent human validation of focal species detections. Northern spotted owls were detected in 28% of sampled hexagons range-wide, including 16% in Washington, 25% in Oregon, and 60% in California. Occupancy patterns remained consistent compared to previous years, with higher occupancy concentrated in southern portions of the geographic range and continued low occupancy across much of the Washington Cascades and Oregon Coast Range. Barred owls were detected in 86% of sampled hexagons and remained broadly distributed throughout most of the NWFP area. Marbled murrelets were detected in 50% of reviewed hexagons within NWFP marbled murrelet management zones, with highest occupancy occurring in coastal forests of Oregon and Washington. The 2025 field season occurred under substantial operational constraints that reduced sampling effort by approximately half relative to 2023 and 2024 because of staffing limitations affecting participating federal agencies. Despite these reductions, the NWFP-PAM framework continued to provide broad-scale, spatially representative ecological information across the NWFP area. Results highlight the growing importance of passive acoustic monitoring and machine learning approaches for long-term biodiversity monitoring under changing environmental and operational conditions.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.5%
2
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.9%
3
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
4
Forest Ecology and Management
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
5
Biological Conservation
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
7
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
8
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
9
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.7%
10
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.4%
12
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
13
Conservation Science and Practice
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
14
Conservation Letters
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
15
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Ecological Indicators
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
Environmental DNA
56 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
18
Journal of Environmental Management
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
19
Conservation Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
20
Biological Invasions
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
21
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
22
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
23
Environmental Research Letters
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
FACETS
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
25
Ecological Informatics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%