Back

Determining critical water potentials for creeping bentgrass seedling root elongation when exposed to PEG induced dehydration

Petrella, D.; Morrow, M.; Nangle, E.; Sessoms, F. J.

2026-05-27 plant biology
10.64898/2026.05.26.727908 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera) is a turfgrass species established on golf course surfaces but is criticized for high irrigation requirements. While genetic variation for water deficit stress tolerance exists between cultivars, the lack of defined critical soil water potential thresholds (Soil {Psi}crit) for this species complicates precise irrigation strategies and benchmarks for plant breeding. This study utilized a polyethylene glycol (PEG) infused agar-based system to simulate water potential reductions and determine the water potential threshold ({Psi}crit) for seedling root elongation. Creeping bentgrass cv Pure distinction seedlings were subjected to six water potentials ({Psi}) ranging from -0.36 MPa (no PEG applied) to -1.72 MPa. Daily digital imaging was used to measure root elongation over 5 days. Results across two experiments demonstrated that creeping bentgrass seedlings are highly sensitive to mild reductions in {Psi}. A reduction to -0.61 MPa significantly decreased root length and growth rates by over 50% compared to the control. Regression models predicted that a {Psi}crit of approximately -0.45 MPa reduced daily root growth by 25%, while upwards {Psi} of -1.0 MPa resulted in a 75% reduction of seedlings root growth. Furthermore, seedlings exposed to the lowest water potentials were predicted to require an additional 30 to 46 days to achieve the same root length as control plants. These findings establish specific {Psi}crit benchmarks for water deficit stress tolerance using a PEG-based system to induce dehydration. These methods can be used in breeding programs, and will help develop more accurate experiments examining the mechanisms of water deficit stress tolerance.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Plant Direct
95 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.6%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 11%
18.3%
3
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.4%
4
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.4%
6
Plant and Soil
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
8
American Journal of Botany
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
9
Plant Methods
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
10
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.4%
11
Crop Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
Plant Stress
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Plants
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
14
Tree Physiology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
15
Environmental and Experimental Botany
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
16
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
17
The Plant Genome
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
18
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
19
AoB PLANTS
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
20
Journal of Visualized Experiments
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
21
Planta
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
22
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
Plant Science
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
BMC Plant Biology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%
26
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
27
Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
28
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%