Back

Evolutionary Dynamics of Paramecium Mitochondrial Genomes

Telkar, R.; Ali, F.; Miller, S. F.; Ni, J.; Bright, L.; DeLong, J. P.; Montooth, K. L.; Krenek, S.; Fujishima, M.; Nanba, K.; Lynch, M.

2026-05-29 genomics
10.64898/2026.05.26.727735 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Ciliates are a diverse group of single-celled eukaryotes that can exhibit a wide range of genetic diversity within morphologically indistinguishable species. However, they are still not well studied as their mechanisms of speciation and the extent of diversification remain unknown. Mitochondrial genomes offer an effective framework for resolving species relationships and evolutionary changes. Here, we analyzed a globally sampled dataset of Paramecium to understand the evolution of mitochondrial genomes in ciliates. Phylogenetic analysis of linear mitochondrial genomes shows the presence of cryptic diversity beyond the P. aurelia complex, with P. bursaria lineage appearing as a deeply diverging out-group. Protein-coding genes are largely conserved, with limited rearrangements, and some ciliate-specific genes appear to be missing in P. bursaria. Population genetic analysis show little to no evidence of recombination along with substantial differences in effective population size across species. Patterns of molecular evolution also indicate purifying selection as the predominant force, the strength of which is at least as strong as in the nucleus and consistent with mitochondrial effective population sizes that are similar or larger than those of the nucleus. Across the functional groups, the electron transport chain and ribosomal genes are highly constrained, while ciliate-specific ymf genes show reduced efficacy of selection compared to the others. These findings offer a basis for connecting mitochondrial variation to evolutionary divergence, functional constraint, and speciation in microbial eukaryotes.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
49.1%
2
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 1%
7.0%
50% of probability mass above
3
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.7%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 11%
4.7%
5
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.2%
6
Nature Ecology & Evolution
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
7
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
8
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.3%
9
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
10
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
11
Microbial Genomics
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
12
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.3%
13
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
14
The ISME Journal
228 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
15
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
16
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%
17
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.6%
18
Journal of Heredity
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
19
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
20
Plant and Cell Physiology
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
21
Algal Research
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
22
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.6%
23
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
24
Systematic Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%