Back

Transcatheter Bicaval Valve Implantation For Treatment Of Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation: A Single Centre Registry

Ghazi, A. M.; Ow, J. K.; Quah, W. J.; Azmi Yahaya, S.

2026-05-27 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.05.26.26354174 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Heterotopic caval valve implantation using the TricValve(R) (OrbusNeich P&F) is a unique interventional approach for treatment of severe Tricuspid Regurgitation in patients who are deemed ineligible for surgery. Given the complexity and novelty of TricValve(R) implantation, there is a pressing need for robust clinical data to evaluate its safety, efficacy, and long-term outcomes. Our study assesses the clinical results of patients followed up for 1 year from our center. Methods: Retrospective, single center registry involving patients who have undergone TricValve(R) Transcatheter Bicaval Valves System (OrbusNeich P&F) implantation for the treatment of severe tricuspid regurgitation. Results: Fourteen patients were included. The mean age was 67.5 {+/-} 8.7 years, with high surgical risk (mean EuroSCORE II 6.1 {+/-} 3.7). Procedural success was achieved in thirteen patients, with no reported in-hospital mortality or stroke among all fourteen patients. At 1-year, significant improvements were observed in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class (86% Class III at baseline to 0% Class III at 1 year, P=0.002) and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12) scores (mean 32.0 {+/-} 7.4 to 42.4 {+/-} 12.0, P=0.015). TR Regurgitant Volume significantly decreased (65.5 {+/-} 16.9 ml to 38.2 {+/-} 13.6 ml, P=0.005). No deaths or strokes occurred during follow-up. Rehospitalization due to heart failure occurred in 14% (2 out of 14) of patients. Conclusion: In this single-center registry of high-risk patients, TricValve(R) implantation was associated with a favorable safety profile, significant reduction in tricuspid regurgitant volume, and meaningful improvements in functional status and quality of life at 1 year follow-up.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.