Back

Transcatheter Bicaval Valve Implantation For Treatment Of Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation: A Single Centre Registry

Ghazi, A. M.; Ow, J. K.; Quah, W. J.; Azmi Yahaya, S.

2026-05-27 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.05.26.26354174 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Heterotopic caval valve implantation using the TricValve(R) (OrbusNeich P&F) is a unique interventional approach for treatment of severe Tricuspid Regurgitation in patients who are deemed ineligible for surgery. Given the complexity and novelty of TricValve(R) implantation, there is a pressing need for robust clinical data to evaluate its safety, efficacy, and long-term outcomes. Our study assesses the clinical results of patients followed up for 1 year from our center. Methods: Retrospective, single center registry involving patients who have undergone TricValve(R) Transcatheter Bicaval Valves System (OrbusNeich P&F) implantation for the treatment of severe tricuspid regurgitation. Results: Fourteen patients were included. The mean age was 67.5 {+/-} 8.7 years, with high surgical risk (mean EuroSCORE II 6.1 {+/-} 3.7). Procedural success was achieved in thirteen patients, with no reported in-hospital mortality or stroke among all fourteen patients. At 1-year, significant improvements were observed in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class (86% Class III at baseline to 0% Class III at 1 year, P=0.002) and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12) scores (mean 32.0 {+/-} 7.4 to 42.4 {+/-} 12.0, P=0.015). TR Regurgitant Volume significantly decreased (65.5 {+/-} 16.9 ml to 38.2 {+/-} 13.6 ml, P=0.005). No deaths or strokes occurred during follow-up. Rehospitalization due to heart failure occurred in 14% (2 out of 14) of patients. Conclusion: In this single-center registry of high-risk patients, TricValve(R) implantation was associated with a favorable safety profile, significant reduction in tricuspid regurgitant volume, and meaningful improvements in functional status and quality of life at 1 year follow-up.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.5%
2
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.1%
4
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.8%
5
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
7
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
8
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
9
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
10
Heart Rhythm
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
12
International Journal of Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
14
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
15
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
16
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
17
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
18
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
19
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
20
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
21
JACC: Basic to Translational Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
22
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
23
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
24
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%