Back

An ECG foundation model for generalizable cardiac function prediction across the lifespan

Yang, Y.; Peracchio, L.; Mayourian, J.; Miller, T.; La Cava, W.

2026-05-27 health informatics
10.64898/2026.05.26.26354128 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiography (AI-ECG) enables scalable, low-cost cardiac dysfunction screening, but existing models are annotation-intensive and predominantly adult-derived, leaving paediatric generalizability uncertain. Paediatric cohorts exhibit highly variable cardiac morphology and function compared to adults, which may be useful for learning generalizable AI-ECG models. Methods We pretrained ECG-Fyler on a predominantly paediatric, all-age cohort at Boston Children's Hospital (1992-2023), annotated with a cardiology-specific coding system (Fyler codes), and evaluated it on assessments from echocardiography (echo) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) studies. We validated on an external adult cohort from Columbia University Irving Medical Center. Performance was benchmarked against several AI-ECG foundation models by AUROC across age groups, lesion types, and limited-data scenarios. Findings The pretraining cohort comprised 782,138 ECGs from 255,271 patients (median age: 10.9 years, IQR: [2.8-16.8]). Internal evaluation included 178,495 ECG-echo pairs (median age: 10.9 [3.7-17.0]) and 8,584 ECG-CMR pairs (median age: 20.7 [15.6-29.6]). External validation included 82,543 ECG-echo pairs from adults (median age: 64.0 [52.0-74.0]). ECG-Fyler improved AUROC across biventricular dysfunction and dilation tasks, with the largest gains in low-data settings. In internal validation, ECG-Fyler detected low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF [&le;] 40%) from only 100 fine-tuning samples (AUROC: 0.80, 95% CI: [0.78-0.80]), outperforming other models (AUROC < 0.65) and improving with additional fine-tuning (AUROC: 0.94 [0.93-0.94]). Similar improvements were observed for CMR-derived LVEF, RVEF, and ventricular dilation. In external validation on adults, ECG-Fyler exhibited an AUROC of 0.83 (CI: [0.82-0.85]) for LVEF [&le;] 40%. After fine-tuning on less than 10% of external data, LVEF [&le;] 45% performance (AUROC: 0.87 [0.86-0.88]) outperformed a fully trained, site-specific prior model (AUROC: 0.85 [0.84-0.87]). Interpretation Pretraining on richly annotated, paediatric-dominant ECGs yields models that transfer efficiently across institutions and ages, supporting AI-ECG screening and triage when labels or imaging access are limited. Funding National Institutes of Health (R01LM012973); Kostin Innovation Fund, Boston Children's Hospital

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.8%
2
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
3
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.6%
4
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.5%
5
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.7%
8
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
9
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
10
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.8%
13
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
14
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
16
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
17
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
19
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.8%
23
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Nature Cardiovascular Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
25
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
26
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
27
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
29
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.7%
30
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%