Back

Longitudinal performance of the ENLIST ENL Severity Scale in individuals with severe erythema nodosum leprosum: responsiveness, trajectories and clinical features - a secondary analysis of the Methotrexate and Prednisolone study - MaPs in ENL

de Barros, B.; Hamza, A.; Getachew, A.; Medhi, M.; Sultana, F.; Acharya, B.; Pai, V.; Wakade, A.; Bhame, B.; Hagge, D.; Napit, I.; Shah, M.; Maximus, N.; Darlong, J.; Listiawan, M. Y.; Doni, S.; Nicholls, P.; Genser, B.; Lambert, S. M.; Lockwood, D. N. J.; Walker, S. L.

2026-06-01 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.05.26.26354110 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Erythema nodosum leprosum (ENL) is a severe inflammatory complication of lepromatous leprosy characterised by recurrent inflammatory episodes often requiring prolonged immunosuppression. The severity of ENL can be quantified using the validated and reliable ENLIST ENL Severity Scale (EESS). The longitudinal course of ENL and how it is captured using standardised severity measures has not been well described. We prospectively evaluated the changes in ENL severity over time using the EESS in a randomised clinical trial. Methods We conducted a post-hoc analysis of participants enrolled in the Methotrexate and Prednisolone Study in ENL, an international multicentre randomised controlled trial conducted in Ethiopia, India, Indonesia, and Nepal. Adults with severe ENL (EESS score [&ge;]9) were followed for 60 weeks with repeated EESS assessments. Longitudinal trajectories were analysed using mixed-effects regression models. Item-level analyses characterised the clinical phenotype captured by the scale. Associations between EESS score, prednisolone exposure, and dermatology-specific health-related quality of life measured using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) were examined. Findings A total of 135 participants contributed 1,958 EESS assessments. Mean EESS declined rapidly during the first four weeks of treatment (-2.10 points/week; 95% CI -2.36 to -1.84; p<0.001), increased modestly during reduction in corticosteroid dose (weeks 4-20), and gradually declined thereafter. Severe ENL (EESS score [&ge;]9) occurred in 20.6% of visits and was characterised primarily by pain and cutaneous inflammatory manifestations. Participants who required additional prednisolone had persistently higher EESS scores and showed limited improvement compared with those who did not receive additional prednisolone. Longitudinal EESS scores were strongly correlated with the DLQI score (Spearmans {rho}=0.75; p<0.001). Conclusion The EESS captures clinically meaningful changes in ENL severity, aligns with treatment decisions, and reflects patient-reported severity over time. These findings support the use of the EESS as a robust tool for monitoring ENL severity in both clinical research and routine care.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.6%
2
JID Innovations
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
3
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.5%
4
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
142 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.5%
5
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.5%
6
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
129 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
7
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.2%
8
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
9
European Respiratory Journal
59 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
10
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
73 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
11
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.1%
12
Journal of Fungi
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
13
The Lancet Microbe
44 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Clinical Infectious Diseases
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.7%
16
BMJ Public Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
17
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
19
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
20
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.5%
21
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
22
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
23
RMD Open
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
24
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
25
British Journal of Dermatology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
26
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
27
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
28
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
29
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
30
Journal of Infection
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%