Association of a polygenic risk score with coronary atherosclerotic burden in clinical CT angiograms
Hartmann, K.; Gannon, M.; Natarajan, P.; Greenland, P.; Biobank, P. M.; Levin, M.
Show abstract
Background: Polygenic risk scores (PRS) for coronary artery disease (CAD) are associated with cardiovascular events, but the relationship between inherited risk and routinely reported coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) findings has not been studied. Objectives: To evaluate associations between a genome-wide PRS for angiographic coronary disease burden and coronary CTA-derived measures of atherosclerotic severity in a real-world clinical cohort. Methods: We studied Penn Medicine BioBank participants with available genotypes and clinically obtained coronary CTA reports. A previously published PRS for angiographic CAD burden was calculated using pgsc_calc. CAD-RADS scores and coronary artery calcium (CAC) values were extracted from radiology reports using the large language model Llama 3.1 8B. Associations between PRS and CAD-RADS severity were evaluated using Bayesian cumulative ordinal logit regression, while associations with log-transformed CAC burden were assessed using Bayesian linear regression. Results: Among 630 participants, median age was 59 years (IQR 49 - 68), 53% were female, 62% were genetically similar to a European reference population, and 34% to an African reference population. LLM-extracted CAD-RADS and CAC values demonstrated near-perfect agreement with manual abstraction. Higher PRS was associated with greater coronary atherosclerotic burden on CTA. Each 1-standard deviation (SD) increase in PRS was associated with a 20% higher odds of belonging to a more severe CAD-RADS category (cumulative OR 1.20, 95% credible interval 1.06-1.44). Higher PRS was also associated with greater CAC burden ({beta} 0.38, 95% credible interval 0.15 - 0.61). Conclusions: Polygenic risk for angiographic coronary disease burden is reflected in clinically reported coronary CTA severity measures, including CAD-RADS and CAC. These findings demonstrate that inherited susceptibility to CAD manifests as greater anatomic atherosclerotic burden at the time of clinical presentation and support further investigation of genetic risk integration into imaging-based cardiovascular risk assessment.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Dynamic Importance of Genomic and Clinical Risk for Coronary Artery Disease Over the Life Course 95%
- Coronary Artery Disease Risk of Familial Hypercholesterolemia Genetic Variants Independent of Historical Cholesterol Exposure 94%
- An integrated polygenic and clinical risk tool enhances coronary artery disease prediction 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetically Predicted IL-18 Inhibition and Risk of Cardiovascular Events: A Mendelian Randomization Study 93%
- The environment-sensing aryl-hydrocarbon receptor inhibits the chondrogenic fate of modulated smooth muscle cells in atherosclerotic lesions 92%
- Polygenic Risk Score Modifies Risk of Coronary Artery Disease Conferred by Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Vascular smooth muscle cell atherosclerosis trajectories characterized at single cell resolution identify causal transcriptomic and epigenomic mechanisms of disease risk 94%
- Genome-Wide Associations Of Aortic Distensibility Suggest Causal Relationships With Aortic Aneurysms And Brain White Matter Hyperintensities 93%
- TWIST1 drives endothelial-to-mesenchymal-transition to stabilize atherosclerotic plaques 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Female gene networks are expressed in myofibroblast-like smooth muscle cells in vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques. 93%
- Single-Cell Multimodal Profiling Reveals a Novel CD26+ Fibroblast Subpopulation in Atherosclerosis 93%
- High-Dimensional Single-Cell Multimodal Landscape of Human Carotid Atherosclerosis 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.