Back

Association of a polygenic risk score with coronary atherosclerotic burden in clinical CT angiograms

Hartmann, K.; Gannon, M.; Natarajan, P.; Greenland, P.; Biobank, P. M.; Levin, M.

2026-05-27 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.05.26.26353801 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Polygenic risk scores (PRS) for coronary artery disease (CAD) are associated with cardiovascular events, but the relationship between inherited risk and routinely reported coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) findings has not been studied. Objectives: To evaluate associations between a genome-wide PRS for angiographic coronary disease burden and coronary CTA-derived measures of atherosclerotic severity in a real-world clinical cohort. Methods: We studied Penn Medicine BioBank participants with available genotypes and clinically obtained coronary CTA reports. A previously published PRS for angiographic CAD burden was calculated using pgsc_calc. CAD-RADS scores and coronary artery calcium (CAC) values were extracted from radiology reports using the large language model Llama 3.1 8B. Associations between PRS and CAD-RADS severity were evaluated using Bayesian cumulative ordinal logit regression, while associations with log-transformed CAC burden were assessed using Bayesian linear regression. Results: Among 630 participants, median age was 59 years (IQR 49 - 68), 53% were female, 62% were genetically similar to a European reference population, and 34% to an African reference population. LLM-extracted CAD-RADS and CAC values demonstrated near-perfect agreement with manual abstraction. Higher PRS was associated with greater coronary atherosclerotic burden on CTA. Each 1-standard deviation (SD) increase in PRS was associated with a 20% higher odds of belonging to a more severe CAD-RADS category (cumulative OR 1.20, 95% credible interval 1.06-1.44). Higher PRS was also associated with greater CAC burden ({beta} 0.38, 95% credible interval 0.15 - 0.61). Conclusions: Polygenic risk for angiographic coronary disease burden is reflected in clinically reported coronary CTA severity measures, including CAD-RADS and CAC. These findings demonstrate that inherited susceptibility to CAD manifests as greater anatomic atherosclerotic burden at the time of clinical presentation and support further investigation of genetic risk integration into imaging-based cardiovascular risk assessment.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.8%
2
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
8.5%
3
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
5
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
6
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
7
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Cardiovascular Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
9
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.6%
10
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.8%
12
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
16
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
18
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
19
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
20
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
21
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
22
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
24
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Metabolism
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
27
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
28
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
30
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%