Back

Impact of pharmacist board certification on health outcomes of critically ill patients: An analysis of the Optimizing Pharmacist-Team Integration for ICU patient Management (OPTIM) study

Smith, S. E.; Henry, K.; Heavner, M.; Keedy, C.; Duong, H.; Chen, Z.; Chen, X.; OPTIM Investigator Team, ; Sikora, A.

2026-06-02 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.64898/2026.05.26.26353672 medRxiv
Show abstract

BACKGROUND: Critical care pharmacists (CCPs) reduce adverse drug events (ADEs) and mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU). Board certification is the established professional standard for CCPs but its impact on ICU patient outcomes, including its relationship between CCP characteristics and workload, remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between pharmacist board certification, CCP workload characteristics, and patient outcomes. METHODS: This was a pre-planned analysis of the multicenter, observational Optimizing Pharmacist Team Integration for ICU Patient Management (OPTIM) study, including adult ICU patients cared for by CCPs. Patients cared for exclusively by board certified pharmacists on every ICU day were categorized as the BCP group; those with at least one day of care from a non board certified pharmacist comprised the non BCP group. The primary outcome was hospital mortality; secondary outcomes included the hazard of discharge alive (HDA) from the ICU and hospital. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between BCP and mortality; Fine-Gray competing risk models were used to assess the relationship between BCP and ICU and hospital HDA. RESULTS: A total of 201 pharmacists (184 BCPs; 17 non BCPs) from 63 institutions caring for 20,537 ICU patients were included. Care provided exclusively by a BCP (vs. >/= 1 day by a non-BCP) was associated with lower mortality (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.92, p=0.002) and both a higher ICU HDA (HR 1.08, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.13, p<0.001) and hospital HDA (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.26, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Daily ICU care delivered by pharmacists with board certification was independently associated with reduced mortality and improved hazard of discharge alive from the ICU. Board-certified pharmacists may enhance the quality and/or efficiency of critical care pharmacy services. These findings support the role of board certification as a modifiable factor to improve patient outcomes and optimize workload in the ICU.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
13.1%
2
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
3
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.7%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.7%
6
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.2%
7
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.2%
8
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
9
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
10
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
11
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.7%
12
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
13
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
14
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.2%
15
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
16
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
19
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
20
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
21
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
22
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
23
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
24
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
25
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
26
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
27
Physiological Genomics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
28
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
29
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%