Back

Deep Learning Spatial Profiling of CD103+CD8+ T Cells and Survival in Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

Abe, T.; Yamashita, K.; Nagasaka, T.; Fujita, M.; Ueda, Y.; Miyake, S.; Ito, R.; Adachi, Y.; Ando, M.; Tsuneki, T.; Okazoe, Y.; Konaka, R.; Takahashi, T.; Kagiyama, H.; Tachibana, T.; Imai, M.; Yoshida, T.; Saito, M.; Mukohyama, J.; Kanayama, K.; Koma, Y.-I.; Otowa, Y.; Hasegawa, H.; Ikeda, T.; Koterazawa, Y.; Aoki, T.; Harada, H.; Urakawa, N.; Goto, H.; Kanaji, S.; Yanagimoto, H.; Matsuda, T.; Takamura, S.; Yamashita, T.; Sasaki, R.; Fukumoto, T.; Kakeji, Y.

2026-05-28 oncology
10.64898/2026.05.26.26353629 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are established prognostic markers in colorectal cancer, yet the clinical significance of CD103+CD8+ tissue-resident memory-like (TRM-like) T cells in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) remains unknown. Methods: We quantified CD8+ and CD103+CD8+ T-cell densities in stromal and intratumoral compartments of post-NACRT resection specimens from 40 LARC patients using Cu-Cyto, a deep learning-based imaging cytometry platform. Associations with survival, pathological response, and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) were examined. Treatment-induced T-cell dynamics were assessed in paired pretreatment biopsies and post-NACRT resections (n = 9). Results: High stromal CD103+CD8+ density independently predicted better 5-year RFS (67.4% vs. 12.1%, p < 0.001) and OS (80.0% vs. 26.6%, p = 0.016); intratumoral density showed no prognostic significance. Pathological response correlated with stromal CD8+ but not CD103+CD8+ density. Paired analysis revealed a selective non-expansion of the CD103+ subset: stromal CD8+ T cells increased significantly after NACRT while CD103+CD8+ density remained unchanged. AC may preferentially benefit patients with low stromal CD103+CD8+ density. Conclusions: Stromal CD103+CD8+ T-cell density is a robust independent prognostic biomarker in rectal cancer after NACRT that appears to reflect pre-existing rather than treatment-induced immunity. Given its stability across NACRT, pretreatment biopsy assessment may provide equivalent prognostic information, with potential implications for patient stratification before treatment initiation.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.9%
2
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
75 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.9%
3
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.6%
4
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.3%
5
Cancer Cell
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
OncoImmunology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
7
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.1%
8
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.1%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.1%
10
European Journal of Cancer
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
11
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.3%
12
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.6%
14
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
15
Modern Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
16
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
17
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.0%
18
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
19
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.0%
20
Translational Oncology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
21
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
The Journal of Pathology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
23
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
24
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
25
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
26
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
27
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
28
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.6%