Back

Deep Learning Spatial Profiling of CD103+CD8+ T Cells and Survival in Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

Abe, T.; Yamashita, K.; Nagasaka, T.; Fujita, M.; Ueda, Y.; Miyake, S.; Ito, R.; Adachi, Y.; Ando, M.; Tsuneki, T.; Okazoe, Y.; Konaka, R.; Takahashi, T.; Kagiyama, H.; Tachibana, T.; Imai, M.; Yoshida, T.; Saito, M.; Mukohyama, J.; Kanayama, K.; Koma, Y.-I.; Otowa, Y.; Hasegawa, H.; Ikeda, T.; Koterazawa, Y.; Aoki, T.; Harada, H.; Urakawa, N.; Goto, H.; Kanaji, S.; Yanagimoto, H.; Matsuda, T.; Takamura, S.; Yamashita, T.; Sasaki, R.; Fukumoto, T.; Kakeji, Y.

2026-05-28 oncology
10.64898/2026.05.26.26353629 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are established prognostic markers in colorectal cancer, yet the clinical significance of CD103+CD8+ tissue-resident memory-like (TRM-like) T cells in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) remains unknown. Methods: We quantified CD8+ and CD103+CD8+ T-cell densities in stromal and intratumoral compartments of post-NACRT resection specimens from 40 LARC patients using Cu-Cyto, a deep learning-based imaging cytometry platform. Associations with survival, pathological response, and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) were examined. Treatment-induced T-cell dynamics were assessed in paired pretreatment biopsies and post-NACRT resections (n = 9). Results: High stromal CD103+CD8+ density independently predicted better 5-year RFS (67.4% vs. 12.1%, p < 0.001) and OS (80.0% vs. 26.6%, p = 0.016); intratumoral density showed no prognostic significance. Pathological response correlated with stromal CD8+ but not CD103+CD8+ density. Paired analysis revealed a selective non-expansion of the CD103+ subset: stromal CD8+ T cells increased significantly after NACRT while CD103+CD8+ density remained unchanged. AC may preferentially benefit patients with low stromal CD103+CD8+ density. Conclusions: Stromal CD103+CD8+ T-cell density is a robust independent prognostic biomarker in rectal cancer after NACRT that appears to reflect pre-existing rather than treatment-induced immunity. Given its stability across NACRT, pretreatment biopsy assessment may provide equivalent prognostic information, with potential implications for patient stratification before treatment initiation.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
25.5%
2
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
3
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
4
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
5
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
6
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.0%
9
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
10
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
11
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
12
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
13
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
14
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
15
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
16
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
17
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
18
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.5%
19
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
20
OncoImmunology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.2%
22
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
23
Cancer Immunology Research
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
24
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
26
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
27
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
28
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
29
Journal of Experimental Medicine
106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
30
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%