Non-inferiority of a red-blood-cell--only transfusion strategy compared with balanced resuscitation in adults with massive gastrointestinal haemorrhage: a propensity-score-weighted cohort study

Background. Balanced (1:1:1) transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs), plasma, and platelets is the standard of care in trauma-induced massive haemorrhage, where early coagulopathy is a defining feature. In gastrointestinal (GI) haemorrhage this physiology is non-prominent, and whether plasma and platelets provide benefit when [≥] 10 RBC units are required within 24 hours is unknown. Objective. To test whether a red-blood-cell-only (RBC-only) transfusion strategy is non-inferior to a balanced (Balanced) strategy for in-hospital mortality in adults meeting massive-transfusion criteria for GI haemorrhage. Design. Single-centre retrospective cohort of 559 adult massive-transfusion encounters (536 patients; 2021-2025) with a primary admitting diagnosis of upper, lower, or unspecified GI haemorrhage. Exposures were RBC-only versus Balanced (RBCs with any plasma and/or platelets). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, with a pre-specified 5-percentage-point (pp) non-inferiority margin on the absolute risk difference and a 3-pp sensitivity margin. Analysis used augmented inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting (AIPTW) with bootstrap inference (2,000 resamples by patient). Five pre-specified sensitivity analyses were performed. Results. 505 encounters (90.3%) received RBC-only and 54 (9.7%) received Balanced transfusion. The AIPTW risk difference for in-hospital mortality (RBC-only - Balanced) was -19.8 pp (95% CI -68.1 - -2.2 pp). Non-inferiority was demonstrated at both the primary 5-pp and the more stringent 3-pp margins. Five pre-specified sensitivity analyses, (1) a propensity-score matched cohort, (2) a complete-case model incorporating INR, (3) a broader GI diagnosis set (n = 749), (4) a first encounter per patient restriction, and (5) E-value bound analysis were concordant with the primary estimate. Conclusion. In this propensity-score-weighted cohort of adults with massive GI haemorrhage, an RBC-only transfusion strategy was non-inferior to a balanced strategy for in-hospital mortality at both 5-pp and 3-pp margins. The findings support individualized use of plasma and platelets in GI haemorrhage rather than reflexive application of the 1:1:1 trauma protocol; prospective confirmation is warranted.