Objectively measured social media use and psychosocial wellbeing among adolescent girls: a prospective study
Kosola, S.; Moro, S.; Holopainen, E.
Show abstract
Objective: Cross-sectional studies indicate associations between self-reported social media use and adolescent wellbeing outcomes. We aimed to evaluate longitudinal associations of objectively measured smartphone and social media use with psychosocial wellbeing. Design: Observational study with one year of follow-up Setting: High schools in Finland from 2022 to 2023 Population: 259 adolescent girls (mean age 16.3 years at baseline) Main outcome measures: screenshots depicting smartphone and social media use, Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale (BSMAS), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 questionnaire, Body Appreciation Scale 2 (BAS-2) and visual analogue scales (VAS) of mood, tiredness, and loneliness Results: Across one year of follow-up, anxiety, body appreciation, and mood improved, but possible social media addiction increased from 15% to 17%. Social media addiction at baseline was associated with increased anxiety (r=0.29, p<0.001), lower body appreciation (r=-0.15, p=0.022), and more loneliness (r=0.20, p=0.001) at follow-up. Anxiety at baseline was associated with social media addiction at follow-up (r=0.19, p=0.005). The highest quartile of TikTok users reported more social media addiction (BSMAS 19 [IQR 16-21] vs. 17 [IQR 14-20]; p=0.009) and lower body appreciation (BAS-2 32 [IQR 28-38] vs. 35 [IQR 29-40]; p=0.003) than did others. The highest quartile of Snapchat users reported more social media addiction (BSMAS 19 [IQR 15-21] vs. 17 [IQR 14-20]; p=0.007) and tiredness (VAS 21 [IQR 13-32] vs. 26 [IQR 15-35]; p=0.049) than did others. Conclusions: Consistent with cross-sectional studies, social media addiction was associated with poorer psychosocial outcomes across follow-up. Policies to protect adolescents from social media addiction are urgently needed.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- How can digital citizen science approaches improve ethical smartphone use surveillance among youth: traditional surveys versus ecological momentary assessments 96%
- Exploring perspectives on digital smoking cessation just-in-time adaptive interventions: A focus group study with adult smokers and smoking cessation professionals 93%
- Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of an online mindful walking intervention among COVID-19 long haulers: A mixed method study including daily diary surveys 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Social networking service, patient-generated health data, and population health informatics: patterns and implications for using digital technologies to support mental health 94%
- Tracking private WhatsApp discourse about COVID-19: A longitudinal infodemiology study in Singapore 93%
- Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based Chatbots in Promoting Health Behavioral Changes: A Systematic Review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mobile phones: The effect of its presence on learning and memory 94%
- Temperament profile and its association with the vulnerability to smartphone addiction of medical students in Indonesia 94%
- “It’s hard to keep a distance when you’re with someone you really care about” — a qualitative study of adolescents’ pandemic-related health literacy and how Covid-19 affects their lives 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Have the COVID-19 Pandemic and Lockdown Affected Children’s Mental Health in the Long Term? A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study 95%
- A Mobile App for Prolonged Grief among Bereaved Parents: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial 92%
- Impact of COVID-19 on College Students' at One of the Most Diverse Campuses in the United States: A Factor Analysis of Survey Data 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sociodemographic factors and self-restraint from social behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan: a cross-sectional study 90%
- Exploring the application of behaviour change technique taxonomies in childhood obesity prevention interventions: A systematic scoping review 89%
- Smoking, distress and COVID-19 in England: cross-sectional population surveys from 2016 to 2020 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.