The use of generative artificial intelligence applications by undergraduate dental students
Brondani, M.; Garbin, J. R.; Soheilipour, S.; Lee, V.
Show abstract
Background: Higher education has been transformed by the rapid integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools into academia. The objective of the present study was to examine how and for what purposes senior undergraduate dental students use GenAI tools in academic assignments. Methods: This cross-sectional study uses data from three written assignments submitted by two consecutive cohorts of graduating fourth-year dental students at the Faculty of Dentistry at the University of British Columbia, for a total of 120 students. The assignments focused on different subjects where students had to offer their views, including community water fluoridation. When using GenAI, students were asked to disclose whether and how such tools were used, and for what purpose. Descriptive statistics (e.g., means, frequencies, and proportions) were conducted via IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 27.0). Results: From the two cohort of students, 102 (85%) disclosed the use of GenAI tools in at least one assignment; of these, 69 (67.6%) reported using these tools in all three assignments. ChatGPT was by far the most frequently used GenAI tool, reported by 89 students (87.2%). Nine students (8.8%) did not specify which tool they had used. The majority of the students (91.2%, n = 93) reported using GenAI for proofreading or grammatical editing. About 9.8% of the students (n = 10) reported more substantive uses, such as relying on GenAI to generate in part or in full the assignment, and/or assessing the credibility of references. Conclusions: In our study, the use of GenAI tools was highly prevalent among senior undergraduate dental students for editorial purposes. A smaller but notable proportion of students engaged in more substantive uses that may carry academic and ethical risks. There is a need for structured AI literacy training and clear, dentistry-specific guidelines to promote responsible and transparent use while safeguarding critical thinking, academic integrity, and professional judgment in dental education.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Theory of radiologist interaction with instant messaging decision support tools: a sequential-explanatory study 91%
- Ethical review of clinical research with generative AI: Evaluating ChatGPT’s accuracy and reproducibility 91%
- Collaborative intelligence in AI: Evaluating the performance of a council of AIs on the USMLE 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Woman Authorship in Pre-print Versus Peer-Reviewed Oral Health-Related Publications: A Two-Year Observational Study 94%
- COVID-19 challenges to dentistry in the new pandemic epicenter: Brazil 93%
- Introducing the 4Ps Model of Transitioning to Distance Learning: a convergent mixed methods study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pain management after dental extractions – non-opioid combination analgesics minimize opioid use for acute dental pain 90%
- Low adherence to existing model reporting guidelines by commonly used clinical prediction models 89%
- Characterizing Potential Conflicts of Interest Among UpToDate and DynaMed Content Contributors 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Silicone toothbrushes: A scoping review of an underutilized tool in global oral health 91%
- A Scoping Review of Deaf Awareness Programs in Health Professional Education 91%
- A qualitative study on factors influencing health workers’ uptake of a pilot surgical antibiotic prophylaxis stewardship programme in selected Georgian hospitals 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.