Back

Impact of AI-Assisted Mammography Reading on Quality Indicators in the Czech Breast Cancer Screening Programme: A Retrospective Study

Veverkova, L.; Dolezalova, Z.; Marackova, V.; Mathew, E.; Urbankova, M.; Ambrozova, M.; Piskovsky, T.; Ngo, O.; Majek, O.

2026-05-26 oncology
10.64898/2026.05.25.26353869 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objectives: The aim of mammographic screening is the early detection of invasive cancers. In the era of artificial intelligence (AI), this tool may improve diagnosis of earlier stages. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact on selected quality indicators retrospectively. Method: The data source was the Breast Cancer Screening Registry using data from one Screening Unit that currently uses AI routinely. The indicators of the cancer detection rate (CDR), further assessment rate (FAR), and recall rate (RR) in the year 2023, when AI was used, and the year 2022, without AI, in women aged 45-69 were compared. The statistical evaluation used the chi-square test and logistic regression adjusting for the effects of age, a woman's risk level, and the screening round at a 5% significance level. Results: In 2022, without AI, 4,034 women aged 45-69 were included, compared with 4,049 women in 2023 when AI was used. This study showed a non-significant increase in CDR from 5.0 breast cancers detected per 1,000 women (non-AI assessment) to 5.2 (AI-assisted assessment), p = 0.919; OR (95% CI): 1.034 (0.542-1.974), a significant decrease in the FAR from 5.2% to 3.9%, p < 0.001; OR (95% CI): 0.665 (0.529-0.836), and a decrease in RR from 2.4% to 1.9%, p = 0.083; OR (95% CI): 0.754 (0.548-1.037). Conclusion: AI has the potential to be a useful tool in the early detection of breast cancer by improving quality through a decrease in FAR and RR, while probably maintaining CDR.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 5%
23.3%
2
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.0%
4
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
5.0%
5
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.0%
6
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.3%
8
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.7%
10
BMC Research Notes
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
11
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
12
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
13
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
14
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
15
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
16
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
17
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
18
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
19
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
20
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
21
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
24
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.7%
26
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Gene Reports
13 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
28
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
30
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%