Impact of AI-Assisted Mammography Reading on Quality Indicators in the Czech Breast Cancer Screening Programme: A Retrospective Study
Veverkova, L.; Dolezalova, Z.; Marackova, V.; Mathew, E.; Urbankova, M.; Ambrozova, M.; Piskovsky, T.; Ngo, O.; Majek, O.
Show abstract
Objectives: The aim of mammographic screening is the early detection of invasive cancers. In the era of artificial intelligence (AI), this tool may improve diagnosis of earlier stages. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact on selected quality indicators retrospectively. Method: The data source was the Breast Cancer Screening Registry using data from one Screening Unit that currently uses AI routinely. The indicators of the cancer detection rate (CDR), further assessment rate (FAR), and recall rate (RR) in the year 2023, when AI was used, and the year 2022, without AI, in women aged 45-69 were compared. The statistical evaluation used the chi-square test and logistic regression adjusting for the effects of age, a woman's risk level, and the screening round at a 5% significance level. Results: In 2022, without AI, 4,034 women aged 45-69 were included, compared with 4,049 women in 2023 when AI was used. This study showed a non-significant increase in CDR from 5.0 breast cancers detected per 1,000 women (non-AI assessment) to 5.2 (AI-assisted assessment), p = 0.919; OR (95% CI): 1.034 (0.542-1.974), a significant decrease in the FAR from 5.2% to 3.9%, p < 0.001; OR (95% CI): 0.665 (0.529-0.836), and a decrease in RR from 2.4% to 1.9%, p = 0.083; OR (95% CI): 0.754 (0.548-1.037). Conclusion: AI has the potential to be a useful tool in the early detection of breast cancer by improving quality through a decrease in FAR and RR, while probably maintaining CDR.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors associated with breast lesions among women attending select teaching and referral health facilities in Kenya: A cross-sectional study 95%
- National diagnostic reference levels for digital diagnostic and screening mammography in Uganda. 95%
- Improved accuracy of breast volume calculation from 3D surface imaging data using statistical shape models 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Machine Learning Ensemble Based on Radiomics to Predict BI-RADS Category and Reduce the Biopsy Rate of Ultrasound-Detected Suspicious Breast Masses 97%
- The NILS study protocol - a retrospective validation study of a preoperative decision-making tool for non-invasive lymph node staging in women with primary breast cancer [ISRCTN14341750] 94%
- Passive Microwave Radiometry (MWR) for diagnostics of COVID-19 lung complications in Kyrgyzstan 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of educational intervention on breast cancer knowledge and breast self-examination among female university students in Bangladesh: a pre-post quasi-experimental one group study 94%
- The role of KPNA2 mutations in breast cancer prognosis: A survey of publicly available databases 93%
- Inference of core needle biopsy whole slide images requiring definitive therapy for prostate cancer 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated and Manual Quantification of Tumour Cellularity in Digital Slides for Tumour Burden Assessment 94%
- Classification models for Invasive Ductal Carcinoma Progression, based on gene expression data-trained supervised machine learning 91%
- Content-based image retrieval assists radiologists in diagnosing eye and orbital mass lesions in MRI 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Palliative care in the treatment of women with breast cancer: a scoping review protocol 93%
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and related control measures on cancer diagnosis in Catalonia:A time-series analysis of primary care electronic health records covering about 5 million people. 91%
- Protocol for a prospective cohort study on the feasibility of application of nutritional ultrasound in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with nutritional risk at hospital discharge: Study on body composition and function (DRECO) 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.