Back

Distinct fibrotic, epithelial and immune transcriptomic programs in phenotypes of chronic lung allograft dysfunction

Ishiwata, T.; Berra, G.; Allen, J.; Burman, A.; Wilson, G.; Carter, Z.; Watanabe, T.; Solomon, M.; Keshavjee, S.; Yeung, J.; Juvet, S. C.; Martinu, T.

2026-05-28 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.05.24.727536 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundChronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is the major cause of late mortality after lung transplantation and includes two principal phenotypes, bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) and restrictive allograft syndrome (RAS). RAS and other phenotypes with RAS-like opacities (RLO) on chest imaging have a poorer prognosis. Despite clear clinical and pathological differences, molecular distinctions between phenotypes remain poorly defined. We aimed to explore gene transcriptional profiles across CLAD phenotypes and relevant controls. MethodsWe performed bulk RNA sequencing on explanted lung tissue from 45 lung transplant recipients with end-stage CLAD (20 with RLO and 25 without RLO). Samples from twenty-seven control donor and lobectomy lungs and sixteen idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) lungs served as comparators. Non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) was used to identify latent transcriptomic signatures, which were correlated with clinical, radiologic, and histopathologic features. ResultsNMF identified seven distinct gene signatures that segregated CLAD phenotypes. RLO-CLAD lungs were enriched for extracellular matrix remodeling and B-cell/plasma cell-associated signatures, overlapping partly with IPF, whereas non-RLO-CLAD showed relative enrichment of epithelial injury and surfactant-response pathways. Signatures related to epithelial homeostasis and ciliary/microtubule function were progressively reduced from control lungs to non-RLO-CLAD and were most suppressed in RLO-CLAD. ConclusionsRLO-CLAD and non-RLO-CLAD, aligning with RAS and BOS phenotypes, show distinct transcriptomic signatures. RLO-CLAD is characterized by profibrotic and humoral immune signatures with profound epithelial dysfunction, whereas non-RLO-CLAD shows relative enrichment of epithelial injury responses. These data provide molecular stratification of CLAD and support the development of phenotype-specific biomarkers and targeted therapies.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
29.4%
2
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.7%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.8%
4
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Respiratory Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 28%
4.2%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.8%
8
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.8%
9
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
10
American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
38 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
11
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
12
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
13
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
14
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.6%
15
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
16
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
17
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Clinical and Translational Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
19
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
21
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
23
American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
24
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%