Back

Standardized Protocols for Global and Local Thermal Nociception in Black Soldier Fly (Hermetia illucens; Diptera: Stratiomyidae) Larvae

Durosaro, S. O.; Barrett, M.

2026-05-27 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.05.23.727392 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Nociception, the capacity to detect tissue-damaging stimuli such as noxious chemicals or high heat, is increasingly studied across insect orders and life stages, informing our understanding of its adaptive value and molecular mechanisms. The black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens; Diptera: Stratiomyidae) is widely recognized as the star of the growing insects as food and feed industry. Black soldier fly larvae (BSFL) are reared at high densities that, combined with their extraordinary metabolism, can generate lethal overheating on farms. Data on the thermal nocifensive capabilities of BSFL could inform our understanding of larval behaviors during overheating events (and potential welfare impacts of thermal slaughter), and provide a comparative datapoint to the well-studied vinegar fly (Drosophila melanogaster; Diptera: Drosophilidae). Accordingly, we adapted global and local thermal nociception methods from larval vinegar flies for use with BSFL. We find that global assays (akin to boiling) adapt easily to both first and sixth instar BSFL, that BSFL exhibit slightly different nocifensive behaviors than last instar vinegar fly larvae, and that BSFL have higher thresholds (thrashing begins at 39.70 {degrees}C in last instar BSFL versus 26.6 {degrees}C in D. melanogaster). In contrast, the classical local nociception assay did not adapt easily to BSFL; a modified version generated a unique, gradual pattern of increasing responsiveness to the probe in sixth instar BSFL (>95% responsiveness above 66 {degrees}C) rather than the sharp cutoff in responsiveness at 52 {degrees}C demonstrated in D. melanogaster. Altogether, these protocols open the door for standardized research on BSFL thermal nociception for fundamental and applied purposes.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Insect Physiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 13%
15.1%
3
Insects
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.9%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 16%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Pest Management Science
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
6
Journal of Experimental Biology
259 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.0%
7
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
8
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
9
Journal of Medical Entomology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
10
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
11
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
12
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Malaria Journal
58 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
122 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
16
Parasites & Vectors
60 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
17
Animal Behaviour
73 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
18
Integrative and Comparative Biology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
19
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
23
Insect Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
24
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%