Back

TIMS-Bench: Towards community standards for benchmarking untargeted trapped ion mobility metabolomics tools and datasets

Rajkumar, P.; Gadiya, Y.; Deleray, V.; Roux, A.; West, K. A.; Allen, A.; Dorrestein, P.; Domingo-Fernandez, D.; Misra, B. B.

2026-05-27 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.05.23.724673 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Untargeted liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)-based metabolomics is an important technology for unbiased discovery of small molecules in biomedical (e.g., drug discovery to diagnostics), animal, plant, environmental, and microbial research. Over the past decade, ion mobility has added an additional dimension to the triplet of MS1, MS2, and retention time, helping resolve co-eluting or isomeric features in an LC-MS/MS that aid in compound identification. Here, we focused on evaluating the current trapped ion mobility spectrometry (TIMS)-amenable feature-finding tools (MZmine 4.9, MS-DIAL 5.5, and MetaboScape 2025 14.0.3) for pre-processing of metabolomics data generated using a popular ion mobility mass spectrometry (IM-MS) technique, TIMS. We leveraged ten public and three benchmark TIMS datasets to evaluate these tools for their strengths and weaknesses. Our results show that MZmine consistently identified the highest number of features and confidently annotated features; however, this performance was accompanied by an increased number of false positives, due to peak splitting, as well as reduced accuracy in collision cross section (CCS) measurements. In contrast, MetaboScape achieved the highest fraction of high-quality MS2 spectra, reflecting a more conservative feature detection strategy. MS-DIAL demonstrated balanced performance, identifying features that other tools missed. Finally, we publicly release the ground-truth datasets and code to support future developments in improving IMS data analysis.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.0%
2
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.6%
3
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.5%
5
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.7%
7
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
8
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
10
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
11
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
12
PROTEOMICS
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
13
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
14
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
15
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.0%
17
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
18
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
19
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
20
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.8%
21
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.7%
24
Metabolomics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
26
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
28
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
29
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.5%
30
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%