Back

Role of genetic risk on progression to diabetes in children with acute pancreatitis

Zhang, L.; Ahmed, F.; Sharp, S. A.; Sun, H.; Thaman, S.; Wasserfall, C. H.; Gloyn, A. L.; Abu-El-Haija, M.

2026-05-25 endocrinology
10.64898/2026.05.23.26353958 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is an established risk factor for diabetes, with approximately 20% of children developing either prediabetes or diabetes within one year of their first episode. Little is known about the diabetes pathophysiology or which individuals are at highest risk. We aimed to evaluate whether genetic risk scores (GRS) for type 1 (T1D) and polygenic risk scores (PRS) type 2 diabetes (T2D) are associated with progression to dysglycemia following AP. Methods: Clinical data were available for 123 children (mean age (IQR), 12 (8-15) years; mean body mass index (BMI), 21.8) with AP who were followed for >1 year. Array genotyping coupled with imputation using the TOPMed reference panel was performed. Genetic ancestry was predicted using a random forest classifier. GRS for T1D and T2D were calculated using either an ancestry-appropriate (T1D-GRS) or a multi-ancestry (T2D-PRS) weighted framework. To evaluate risk compared to the population we used predefined GRS thresholds from UK Biobank. Results: Among the 123 subjects, 24 developed dysglycemia (5 with diabetes and 19 with prediabetes). The majority (75.6%, n=93) of children were of European ancestry. Comparison of the T1D-GRS burden with the UK BioBank showed numerically higher proportions for any given threshold. At the top 5% threshold, 9.7% of our cohort were classified as high-risk compared to 5% in UK Biobank (p<0.05). The elevated T1D-GRS could be primarily attributed to non-HLA variants and was more enriched in those testing positive for [&ge;]1 islet-autoantibody. The T2D-PRS was also elevated in the dysglycemic group but only reached statistical significance in those who were obese. Conclusion: These findings highlight the potential role of both T1D-GRS and T2D-PRS in investigating diabetes susceptibility following AP.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Diabetologia
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.2%
2
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
3
Diabetes Care
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
4
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
5
Diabetes
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.0%
7
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
Molecular Metabolism
105 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.7%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.2%
10
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
11
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
13
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
14
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
15
Gut
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
16
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
18
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
19
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
20
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
21
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
22
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%
23
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
24
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
25
Clinical Proteomics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
26
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%