Back

Wild rice Oryza rufipogon outperforms cultivated rice in stimulating beneficial bacterial endophytes.

Vaccaro, F.; Amenta, M. L.; Passeri, I.; Fagorzi, C.; Varriale, S.; Pencik, A.; Petrik, I.; Brunoni, F.; Brambilla, V.; Rossoni, A.; Mica, E.; Vale, G.; Perrin, E.; Mengoni, A.; Defez, R.; Bianco, C.

2026-05-23 plant biology
10.64898/2026.05.22.727159 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Beneficial interactions between plants and microorganisms strongly influence plant health and productivity, and root exudates play a central role in shaping these associations. This study analyzed the transcriptional responses of the bacterial endophytes Enterobacter asburiae RCA24 and Kosakonia sacchari RCA25 to root exudates from two commercial Italian rice accessions (Oryza sativa Baldo and Vialone Nano) and from an accession of the wild progenitor of tropical rice, Oryza rufipogon. Bacterial transcriptome analyses revealed that RCA24 responds differently to O. sativa varieties and that RCA25 was more stimulated by O. rufipogon. Changes in bacterial gene expression were mainly related to central metabolism, stress response, and signal transduction, highlighting a precise pattern of interaction. On the other hand, transcriptome analysis of inoculated rice revealed that RCA24 triggered broader transcriptional changes in plants than RCA25. Differentially expressed genes were related, especially in shoots, to defense responses, hormone-mediated signaling, and ribosome biogenesis, revealing that plants discriminate bacterial strains in a genotype-specific manner at the transcriptional level. Our findings suggest that traits beneficial to plant-soil microbiota interactions present in O. rufipogon and lost during domestication and diversification could be identified and reintroduced into modern rice varieties to improve sustainable field performance through beneficial microbial associations.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.0%
2
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.3%
3
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
7.1%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.7%
5
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.3%
6
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.3%
8
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.5%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
11
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
12
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
13
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
14
Plant and Soil
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
16
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
17
Environmental Microbiome
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
18
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.2%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.9%
20
Environmental Microbiology Reports
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
21
Plant Science
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
22
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
24
Microbial Biotechnology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
25
Phytobiomes Journal
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
26
Environmental and Experimental Botany
11 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
27
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
29
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
30
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%