Back

Sparse, trainable subnetworks for multi-omics integration: a cross-validated evaluation of the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis across nutrigenomic, toxicogenomic, and oncogenomic datasets

Miszczak, R.

2026-05-26 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.05.22.727123 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Multi-omics integration, the joint analysis of two or more high-dimensional molecular data types collected on the same biological samples, is now a standard analytical approach across nutrigenomics, toxicogenomics, microbiome research, and disease genomics. Existing methods sit on a trade-off between expressiveness and interpretability: latent-variable methods such as MOFA and DIABLO yield compact, biologically interpretable signatures but assume a restrictive linear structure; tree ensembles such as Random Forests achieve strong predictive performance but resist mechanistic interpretation; deep neural networks combine the drawbacks of both, with large numbers of opaque weights and no built-in feature selection. I ask whether the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis (LTH), the conjecture that a randomly initialised dense network contains a sparse subnetwork that matches its accuracy when trained from the original initialisation, can help reconcile this trade-off in the multi-omics setting. I apply Iterative Magnitude Pruning with weight rewinding for 25 rounds (cumulative sparsity 99.6%) on a multi-input fused multi-layer perceptron across eight datasets spanning four biological domains (n=40 to n=1,492), with 5-fold outer cross-validation and inner-validation winning-ticket selection to avoid test-set leakage. On the largest task, TCGA Pan-Cancer (4-class tissue-of-origin, n=1,492), a 2,952-weight subnetwork (83% sparsity) reached 84% +/- 3% test accuracy compared with 86% +/-2 % for the dense network. Pruning improved test accuracy on two TCGA staging tasks (TCGA-LUAD: 51% {+/-} 1% vs 45% {+/-} 5%; TCGA-KIRC: 50% {+/-} 4% vs 48% {+/-} 7%). Networks compressed by 6x to 270x while retaining task-level signal on well-specified tasks. I suggest LTH as a domain-agnostic, prior-free option for sparse neural integration of multi-omics data, complementary to graph-based and pathway-constrained methods.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.