Back

Isolation Strategy Shapes the Matrisome Landscape of Cancer-Associated Fibroblast Extracellular Vesicles

Eldahshoury, M. K.; Moss, E.; Gillett-Woodley, J.; Hindle, M. S.; Ilett, M.; Collins, M. O.; Boyne, J. R.

2026-05-26 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.05.22.727064 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) secrete small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) that mediate stromal remodelling, tumour progression, and pre-metastatic niche formation. A foundational assumption in EV research is that MISEV-compliant preparations from the same conditioned medium are biologically equivalent. Here, we directly challenged this assumption through a side-by-side comparison of ultracentrifugation (UC), size exclusion chromatography (SEC), and the EXODUS nanofiltration platform using breast CAF-conditioned media, characterised in accordance with MISEV2023 guidelines using nanoparticle tracking analysis, cryogenic transmission electron microscopy (Cryo-TEM), and quantitative proteomics. EXODUS and SEC recovered approximately 7-fold more particles per mL than UC. While Cryo-TEM confirmed intact vesicle morphology across all methods, UC preparations exhibited substantial non-vesicular background, with gene ontology analysis revealing significant enrichment of ribosomal, mitochondrial, and ER-derived proteins absent from EXODUS and SEC. Matrisome profiling further uncovered method-dependent divergence in the composition of core versus matrisome-associated proteins, highlighting differences extending beyond standard purity metrics. These findings demonstrate that MISEV2023 compliance is necessary but insufficient for methodological equivalence. The isolation method should be treated as a biological variable and selected according to the EV subpopulation or cargo class under investigation.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.1%
2
Journal of Extracellular Biology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.1%
50% of probability mass above
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.5%
4
ACS Nano
113 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.2%
5
Biomaterials
84 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.5%
6
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.8%
8
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.7%
9
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.5%
10
Journal of Nanobiotechnology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
11
Cell Communication and Signaling
51 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.2%
13
Small
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
14
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
233 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
15
Nanoscale
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
16
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
17
Advanced Healthcare Materials
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
18
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.6%
19
Journal of Proteome Research
234 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
20
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
21
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
22
Molecular Cancer
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
23
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
24
Nature Materials
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
25
PROTEOMICS
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
26
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
27
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.5%