Assessing Foundation Models for Computational Pathology in Endometrial Cancer
Volinsky-Fremond, S.; van den Berg, N.; Barkey Wolf, J.; Schoenpflug, L. A.; Andani, S.; Ortoft, G.; Jobsen, J. J.; Lutgens, L. C.; Powell, M. E.; Mileshkin, L. R.; Mackay, H.; Leary, A.; Razack, R. R.; de Bruyn, M.; de Boer, S. M.; Nout, R. A.; Smit, V. T.; Creutzberg, C. L.; Koelzer, V. H.; Bosse, T.; Horeweg, N.
Show abstract
Computational pathology leverages deep learning to extract clinically relevant information from digitized tumor slides, predicting histopathological subtypes, molecular alterations, and patient outcomes. Recent pipelines increasingly rely on foundation models trained on large pan-cancer datasets to generate generalizable features. In endometrial cancer (EC), their comparative performance for clinical diagnostic tasks remains unexplored. For the first time, this study evaluates the performance of seven state-of-the-art foundation models across morphological, molecular, and prognostic tasks using a large EC dataset of 3,293 patients from randomized trials and clinical cohorts. In addition, their performance was compared to one model (EsVIT) exclusively trained on EC. The foundation models H-OPTIMUS-0, CONCH, and VIRCHOW2, achieved the highest mean performance, but the best-performing foundation model varied by task. The top-performing foundation model outperformed the EC-specific feature extractor EsVIT across all tasks. This study highlights the superiority of foundation models over a domain-specific feature extractor in EC. Selecting the optimal foundation model for novel tasks remains challenging due to performance plateaus and limited information on the training datasets, requiring rigorous benchmarking and domain insight to reach maximum potential.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.