Back

Automated GenePy Gene-Burden Computation via a Reproducible Nextflow Workflow Integrated with the Genomics England (GEL) Lifebit Platform

Nazari, I.; Ennis, S.; Ashton, J.; Cheng, G.

2026-05-24 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.05.22.26353863 medRxiv
Show abstract

Interpretation of rare-disease genomes remains constrained by variant-centric analytical frameworks that insufficiently capture the cumulative impact of multiple variants within a gene. GenePy provides an individual-level, gene-based burden metric that integrates variant consequence, allele frequency, and zygosity into a unified quantitative score, enabling a transition from discrete variant annotation to aggregated gene-level interpretation. In the context of Genomics England, this formulation supports a panel-agnostic, genotype-to-phenotype diagnostic strategy for unresolved monogenic disorders by prioritising genes with elevated mutational burden per individual. Here, we present a fully automated, containerised GenePy workflow deployed through Nextflow and integrated within the Genomics England (GEL) Research Environment via the Lifebit CloudOS platform. This implementation provides scalable, secure, and governance-compliant computation of gene-level burden scores across population-scale cohorts. The workflow harmonises variant annotation, quality control, and chunked data aggregation within modular, reproducible processes designed for high-throughput execution on cloud-native infrastructure. By enabling robust, portable, and auditable gene-level scoring across large rare-disease sequencing datasets, this framework enhances analytical resolution and supports downstream statistical prioritisation, integrative phenotype matching, and hypothesis generation within genotype-to-phenotype diagnostic workflows.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.