Back

Monitoring insecticide resistance in mosquitoes from Tunisia: implications for vector control strategies

Remadi, L.; Kampouraki, N.; Fotakis, E. A.; Grigoraki, L.; balaska, s.; Layouni, S.; Babba, H.; Haouas, N.; Vontas, J.

2026-05-24 molecular biology
10.64898/2026.05.21.726919 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Tunisia is considered a high-risk country for arboviral transmission, and the re-emergence of malaria. Vector control programs predominantly rely on insecticide-based interventions, however knowledge on the insecticide resistance status of local vectors is limited. Here, we determined the mosquito species composition and investigated the resistance status of disease vectors to insecticides, collected from two distinct ecological settings; urban setting and rural setting. Known insecticide resistance loci were molecularly analysed. A total of 210 mosquitoes were collected, representing three main genera: Culex (n = 119), Aedes (n = 79), and Anopheles (n = 1). Within the Culex genus, Cx. pipiens pipiens and Cx. pipiens hybrids were the predominant species in Monastir and Kairouan respectively. Amongst Aedes, Ae. albopictus was the most abundant species in Monastir, while Ae. caspius predominated in Kairouan. The knockdown (kdr) mutation L1014F was detected at both sites across the three Cx. pipiens biotypes. In contrast, Cx. perexiguus showed no kdr mutation in Kairouan and a low frequency in Monastir. Among Aedes species, kdr mutations were detected exclusively in Ae. albopictus, restricted to domain III (mutation I1532T). No mutations in the chs gene were identified in both populations. Aedes albopictus collected in Monastir exhibited a moderate copy number variation for both carboxylesterases 3 and 6. No mutations were detected in the Anopheles labranchia. Our study results indicate the suitability of diflubenzuron for Culex and Ae. albopictus control in central Tunisia, emerging pyrethroid resistance in both vector species, and possibly reduced organophosphate efficacy against Ae. albopictus.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 9%
19.3%
2
Parasites & Vectors
60 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.7%
3
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 1%
10.2%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 8%
7.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Medical and Veterinary Entomology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
6
Journal of Medical Entomology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
7
Pest Management Science
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.6%
8
Malaria Journal
58 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.5%
9
Acta Tropica
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
10
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.4%
11
BMC Medical Research Methodology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
12
Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
13
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
14
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
68 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
15
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
187 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
16
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.6%
17
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
129 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
18
Evolutionary Applications
108 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
19
Journal of Microbiological Methods
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
20
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
21
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
22
International Journal for Parasitology: Drugs and Drug Resistance
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.5%
23
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%
24
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%